From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-329982-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2698 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2012 17:19:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 2675 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Oct 2012 17:19:22 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_LV
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:19:18 +0000
Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9PHJHnm003025	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:19:17 -0400
Received: from zalov.redhat.com (vpn1-6-1.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.6.1])	by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9PHJFfs005906	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);	Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:19:16 -0400
Received: from zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by zalov.redhat.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9PHJFcS030127;	Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:19:15 +0200
Received: (from jakub@localhost)	by zalov.cz (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q9PHJEGl030126;	Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:19:14 +0200
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:27:00 -0000
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Xinliang David Li <davidxl@google.com>
Cc: Wei Mi <wmi@google.com>, Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>,        gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com>
Subject: Re: [asan] migrate runtime from llvm
Message-ID: <20121025171914.GO1752@tucnak.redhat.com>
Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
References: <CAAkRFZ+QtE5NEt-zaVSU9ZHSEOt_6ZsCp2S2=3Ny_OQP8TaMTw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+4CFy587vjy4oYOL3tjyQ6pMhhstCOfzgnqwy1OGhn-OSHGJg@mail.gmail.com> <CAAkRFZLzaTHTuP_vzbfDuY54Pq09JoPr_hSE-NEMJ51rdN-4Pw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+4CFy7jQJTcZ4eD=a-U3e6Kug5QuhMT9B5_6YrQAOx7K6sLHg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+4CFy5523BSLJBXZWof-u0uv7mAdXpEbNfWV+n_JCxF2q=S3w@mail.gmail.com> <CAAkRFZKPXRU0kV6w8ibc2-dXSSHfBqJ0AF2mbh9p1yE0TE89bw@mail.gmail.com> <20121025163942.GM1752@tucnak.redhat.com> <CAAkRFZLsuA4Ydc_NOgz7Nm4HJq0SjVARdincvV13c--zeTqoQA@mail.gmail.com> <20121025165546.GN1752@tucnak.redhat.com> <CAAkRFZJJEDoR79OZWE2L=g7CzP2302Xtv4ZGR=gBtOdfXK-fYA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAAkRFZJJEDoR79OZWE2L=g7CzP2302Xtv4ZGR=gBtOdfXK-fYA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg02309.txt.bz2

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:00:03AM -0700, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> How about statically linking just for executables, not shared library buid?

That is IMHO still a bad idea.

	Jakub