From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5328 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2012 00:52:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 5320 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Nov 2012 00:52:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_VIA_APNIC,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mo11.iij4u.or.jp (HELO mo.iij4u.or.jp) (210.138.174.79) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 00:52:51 +0000 Received: by mo.iij4u.or.jp (mo11) id qA50qn8w013357; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 09:52:49 +0900 Received: from localhost (238.152.138.210.bn.2iij.net [210.138.152.238]) by mbox.iij4u.or.jp (mbox11) id qA50qm4U007816; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 09:52:48 +0900 Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 00:52:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20121105.095246.103896280.kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp> To: oleg.endo@t-online.de Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [SH] Treat SH2A as superscalar From: Kaz Kojima In-Reply-To: <1351992566.8110.51.camel@yam-132-YW-E178-FTW> References: <1351992566.8110.51.camel@yam-132-YW-E178-FTW> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00343.txt.bz2 Oleg Endo wrote: > The SH2A is actually superscalar and thus it might be better to treat it > as such for scheduling. It also is a harvard arch, but after adding it > to the TARGET_HARVARD arch, I've noticed that the macro is only used as > a parameter for instruction cache invalidation. Maybe it's better to > remove that term from the backend. > Tested on rev 193061 with > make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim > \{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,-m4a/-ml,-m4a/-mb}" > > and no new failures. > OK? OK. Regards, kaz