From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19892 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2012 14:24:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 19880 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Dec 2012 14:24:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 14:24:30 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qB6EOTwn020477 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 6 Dec 2012 09:24:30 -0500 Received: from zalov.redhat.com (vpn1-6-17.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.6.17]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qB6EOS79024147 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 6 Dec 2012 09:24:29 -0500 Received: from zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zalov.redhat.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qB6EORCb022404; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 15:24:27 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by zalov.cz (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qB6EORPB022403; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 15:24:27 +0100 Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 14:24:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Konstantin Serebryany Cc: GCC Patches , Dodji Seketeli , Dmitry Vyukov Subject: Re: libsanitizer mege from upstream r169392 Message-ID: <20121206142426.GH2315@tucnak.redhat.com> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00397.txt.bz2 On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 06:17:51PM +0400, Konstantin Serebryany wrote: > Any objections? This is fine. Jakub