From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-334933-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28715 invoked by alias); 4 Jan 2013 11:07:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 28697 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Jan 2013 11:07:07 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 11:07:02 +0000
Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r04B71oa008511	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)	for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 06:07:02 -0500
Received: from zalov.redhat.com (vpn1-5-3.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.5.3])	by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r04B70cb013061	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);	Fri, 4 Jan 2013 06:07:01 -0500
Received: from zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by zalov.redhat.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r04B6xvI015336;	Fri, 4 Jan 2013 12:06:59 +0100
Received: (from jakub@localhost)	by zalov.cz (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r04B6xVX015335;	Fri, 4 Jan 2013 12:06:59 +0100
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 11:07:00 -0000
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clarify error message (PR middle-end/55859)
Message-ID: <20130104110659.GM7269@tucnak.redhat.com>
Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
References: <20130104015946.GA6721@redhat.com> <20130104104224.GK7269@tucnak.redhat.com> <20130104110549.GB6721@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130104110549.GB6721@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00176.txt.bz2

On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 12:05:49PM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 11:42:24AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > I wonder what is the point of using %qs with a fixed string, and ' should be
> > probably replaced by %< and %>, so perhaps
> > 		"argument to %<-O%> should be a non-negative integer, "
> > 		"%<s%>, %<g%> or %<fast%>");
> 
> So, like this?

Yes, thanks.

	Jakub