public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
	       Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [C/C++ PATCH] shift with negative or too big count warning (PR c/48418)
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 20:04:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130108200403.GN7269@tucnak.redhat.com> (raw)

Hi!

As discussed in the PR, on the following testcase we've regressed with the
introduction of c_fully_fold, when the C FE normally warns the argument
isn't folded yet.  Fixed by also warning in c_fully_fold_internal, if before
that function the shift count wasn't INTEGER_CST and after it it is.

The testcase also revealed a regression on the C++ FE side, caused by
SIZEOF_EXPR folding deferral.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2013-01-08  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR c/48418
	* c-common.c (c_fully_fold_internal): Warn for LSHIFT_EXPR and
	RSHIFT_EXPR, if orig_op1 isn't INTEGER_CST, op1 is INTEGER_CST
	and is either negative or bigger or equal to type precision
	of the first operand.

	* typeck.c (cp_build_binary_op): For LSHIFT_EXPR and RSHIFT_EXPR,
	call maybe_constant_value for the negative or too big shift
	count warnings.

	* c-c++-common/pr48418.c: New test.

--- gcc/c-family/c-common.c.jj	2012-12-31 15:05:45.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/c-family/c-common.c	2013-01-08 15:15:47.019347593 +0100
@@ -1269,6 +1269,25 @@ c_fully_fold_internal (tree expr, bool i
 	  && !TREE_OVERFLOW_P (op0)
 	  && !TREE_OVERFLOW_P (op1))
 	overflow_warning (EXPR_LOCATION (expr), ret);
+      if ((code == LSHIFT_EXPR || code == RSHIFT_EXPR)
+	  && TREE_CODE (orig_op1) != INTEGER_CST
+	  && TREE_CODE (op1) == INTEGER_CST
+	  && (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (orig_op0)) == INTEGER_TYPE
+	      || TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (orig_op0)) == FIXED_POINT_TYPE)
+	  && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (orig_op1)) == INTEGER_TYPE
+	  && c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings == 0)
+	{
+	  if (tree_int_cst_sgn (op1) < 0)
+	    warning_at (loc, 0, (code == LSHIFT_EXPR
+				 ? "left shift count is negative"
+				 : "right shift count is negative"));
+	  else if (compare_tree_int (op1,
+				     TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (orig_op0)))
+		   >= 0)
+	    warning_at (loc, 0, (code == LSHIFT_EXPR
+				 ? "left shift count >= width of type"
+				 : "right shift count >= width of type"));
+	}
       goto out;
 
     case INDIRECT_REF:
--- gcc/cp/typeck.c.jj	2013-01-07 14:14:44.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/cp/typeck.c	2013-01-08 15:30:20.202388635 +0100
@@ -4095,10 +4095,13 @@ cp_build_binary_op (location_t location,
 	}
       else if (code0 == INTEGER_TYPE && code1 == INTEGER_TYPE)
 	{
+	  tree const_op1 = maybe_constant_value (op1);
+	  if (TREE_CODE (const_op1) != INTEGER_CST)
+	    const_op1 = op1;
 	  result_type = type0;
-	  if (TREE_CODE (op1) == INTEGER_CST)
+	  if (TREE_CODE (const_op1) == INTEGER_CST)
 	    {
-	      if (tree_int_cst_lt (op1, integer_zero_node))
+	      if (tree_int_cst_lt (const_op1, integer_zero_node))
 		{
 		  if ((complain & tf_warning)
 		      && c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings == 0)
@@ -4106,7 +4109,7 @@ cp_build_binary_op (location_t location,
 		}
 	      else
 		{
-		  if (compare_tree_int (op1, TYPE_PRECISION (type0)) >= 0
+		  if (compare_tree_int (const_op1, TYPE_PRECISION (type0)) >= 0
 		      && (complain & tf_warning)
 		      && c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings == 0)
 		    warning (0, "right shift count >= width of type");
@@ -4138,16 +4141,20 @@ cp_build_binary_op (location_t location,
 	}
       else if (code0 == INTEGER_TYPE && code1 == INTEGER_TYPE)
 	{
+	  tree const_op1 = maybe_constant_value (op1);
+	  if (TREE_CODE (const_op1) != INTEGER_CST)
+	    const_op1 = op1;
 	  result_type = type0;
-	  if (TREE_CODE (op1) == INTEGER_CST)
+	  if (TREE_CODE (const_op1) == INTEGER_CST)
 	    {
-	      if (tree_int_cst_lt (op1, integer_zero_node))
+	      if (tree_int_cst_lt (const_op1, integer_zero_node))
 		{
 		  if ((complain & tf_warning)
 		      && c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings == 0)
 		    warning (0, "left shift count is negative");
 		}
-	      else if (compare_tree_int (op1, TYPE_PRECISION (type0)) >= 0)
+	      else if (compare_tree_int (const_op1,
+					 TYPE_PRECISION (type0)) >= 0)
 		{
 		  if ((complain & tf_warning)
 		      && c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings == 0)
--- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr48418.c.jj	2013-01-08 15:25:36.501003969 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr48418.c	2013-01-08 15:21:54.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+/* PR c/48418 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-Wall -O2" } */
+
+int
+foo (int x)
+{
+  const int a = sizeof (int) * __CHAR_BIT__;
+  const int b = -7;
+  int c = 0;
+  c += x << a;				   /* { dg-warning "left shift count >= width of type" } */
+  c += x << b;				   /* { dg-warning "left shift count is negative" } */
+  c += x << (sizeof (int) * __CHAR_BIT__); /* { dg-warning "left shift count >= width of type" } */
+  c += x << -7;				   /* { dg-warning "left shift count is negative" } */
+  c += x >> a;				   /* { dg-warning "right shift count >= width of type" } */
+  c += x >> b;				   /* { dg-warning "right shift count is negative" } */
+  c += x >> (sizeof (int) * __CHAR_BIT__); /* { dg-warning "right shift count >= width of type" } */
+  c += x >> -7;				   /* { dg-warning "right shift count is negative" } */
+  return c;
+}

	Jakub

             reply	other threads:[~2013-01-08 20:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-08 20:04 Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2013-01-08 22:33 ` Joseph S. Myers
2013-01-09 14:45 ` Jason Merrill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130108200403.GN7269@tucnak.redhat.com \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).