From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-335422-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 20245 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2013 22:13:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 20236 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jan 2013 22:13:05 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from one.firstfloor.org (HELO one.firstfloor.org) (213.235.205.2)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 22:12:52 +0000
Received: by one.firstfloor.org (Postfix, from userid 503)	id A6AF31A9806F; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 23:12:51 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 22:13:00 -0000
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Support __ATOMIC_HLE_RELEASE for __atomic_clear/store_n
Message-ID: <20130113221251.GW30577@one.firstfloor.org>
References: <CAFULd4Ztbccsq9h50Tp-0JGHr4CoFJ2QByf0WgS4Ed92_09=Rw@mail.gmail.com> <20130113203603.GS30577@one.firstfloor.org> <CAFULd4YbA_JPrHgmDRfaA8mHKvRuLitnVkGtzeMMo2FCexkTXw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAFULd4YbA_JPrHgmDRfaA8mHKvRuLitnVkGtzeMMo2FCexkTXw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00665.txt.bz2

> >> +(define_insn "atomic_store<mode>_1"
> >> +  [(set (match_operand:ATOMIC 0 "memory_operand" "=m")
> >> +     (unspec:ATOMIC [(match_operand:ATOMIC 1 "<nonmemory_operand>" "<r><i>")
> >> +                     (match_operand:SI 2 "const_int_operand")]
> >> +                    UNSPEC_MOVA))]
> >> +  ""
> >> +  "%K2mov{<imodesuffix>}\t{%1, %0|%0, %1}")
> >
> > Is that the updated pattern you wanted? It looks similar to mine.
> 
> Yes the attached patch actually implements all proposed fixes.

Ok great. Can you just commit it then? It looks good to me.

-Andi

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.