public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,	libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, rth@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Mark all member functions with memory models always inline
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:30:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130319173016.GF20853@two.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130319161022.GE12913@tucnak.redhat.com>

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 05:10:22PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 08:51:21AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > Using __always_inline as the name of the macro is a bad idea, glibc
> > > headers use that macro already.  Just use something else in public headers
> > > that aren't part of glibc.
> > 
> > That's why I had the ifdef, but ok.  I'll use __force_inline then.
> 
> I'd say Jonathan's _GLIBCXX_ALWAYS_INLINE would be better.
> 
> BTW, have you verified always_inline works fine for -O0?

I did some simple tests and it seemed to work.

But thanks for the counter example.

> 
> with -O0 -mhle doesn't result in xacquire, guess for !optimize
> get_memmodel would need to look through chain of SSA_NAMEs if SSA_NAME
> (that can appear because of inlining), looking for INTEGER_CSTs.

interesting. so need more fixes. i'll look into that. Is there 
already a convenient helper for it?

There was an alternative approach of using a template, but I suppose
that would have the same problem.


-Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-19 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-16 13:30 Andi Kleen
2013-03-16 13:29 ` [PATCH 4/4] Add warning for non-constant memory models Andi Kleen
2013-03-19 21:23   ` Richard Henderson
2013-03-16 13:29 ` [PATCH 2/4] Avoid non constant memory model uses in libatomic Andi Kleen
2013-03-19 21:23   ` Richard Henderson
2013-03-16 13:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] Avoid nonconst memmodels in libitm's local outdated copy of <atomic> too Andi Kleen
2013-03-19 21:23   ` Richard Henderson
     [not found] ` <CAH6eHdR=VhEfAes6S97CfBf0Newe1h3EeoxreRKKHpi4mpJh=w@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]   ` <20130319064639.GA12913@tucnak.redhat.com>
2013-03-19 15:51     ` [PATCH 1/4] Mark all member functions with memory models always inline Andi Kleen
2013-03-19 16:10       ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-03-19 17:30         ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2013-03-20 10:38           ` Richard Biener
2013-03-20 10:46             ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-03-20 11:21               ` Richard Biener
2013-03-20 11:25                 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-03-20 11:29                   ` Richard Biener

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130319173016.GF20853@two.firstfloor.org \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=jwakely.gcc@gmail.com \
    --cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=rth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).