From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Bernd Schmidt <bernds@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>,
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>,
Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, hp@axis.com, hp@bitrange.com,
uweigand@de.ibm.com, Andreas.Krebbel@de.ibm.com,
dje.gcc@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DATA_ABI_ALIGNMENT (PR target/56564)
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 10:56:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130610105535.GR1493@tucnak.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51B5AF99.9000702@codesourcery.com>
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:51:05PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 06/07/2013 10:43 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > But these I think require a good hard look to see if they really intended an
> > ABI alignment:
> >
> > c6x comment explicitly mentions abi
>
> The ABI specifies a minimum alignment for arrays.
Thus after the patch c6x.h (DATA_ALIGNMENT) should be renamed to
DATA_ABI_ALIGNMENT, right?
Jakub
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-10 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-07 19:26 Jakub Jelinek
2013-06-07 20:43 ` Richard Henderson
2013-06-07 21:14 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-06-08 15:13 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-06-10 14:52 ` Richard Henderson
2013-06-10 15:45 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-06-10 19:44 ` David Edelsohn
2013-06-11 0:44 ` DJ Delorie
2013-06-11 6:06 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-06-11 15:20 ` DJ Delorie
2013-06-07 22:56 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2013-06-08 15:05 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-06-10 10:51 ` Bernd Schmidt
2013-06-10 10:56 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2013-06-10 11:03 ` Bernd Schmidt
2013-06-10 11:52 ` Ulrich Weigand
2013-06-12 17:52 ` Edmar Wienskoski
2013-06-13 7:41 ` Alan Modra
2013-06-13 15:37 ` Alan Modra
2013-06-13 15:42 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-06-13 22:48 ` Alan Modra
2013-06-14 9:00 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-06-14 10:42 ` Alan Modra
2013-06-14 10:54 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-06-14 14:57 ` Alan Modra
2013-06-17 23:37 ` David Edelsohn
[not found] ` <0EFAB2BDD0F67E4FB6CCC8B9F87D75692B5204DB@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com>
2013-06-19 7:02 ` FW: " Igor Zamyatin
2013-06-19 7:05 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-06-19 7:12 Igor Zamyatin
2013-06-19 7:22 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-06-19 8:38 ` Richard Biener
2013-06-19 8:44 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-06-19 16:32 ` Mike Stump
2013-06-19 16:25 ` Mike Stump
2013-06-19 19:27 ` Kirill Yukhin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130610105535.GR1493@tucnak.redhat.com \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=Andreas.Krebbel@de.ibm.com \
--cc=bernds@codesourcery.com \
--cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=hp@axis.com \
--cc=hp@bitrange.com \
--cc=jh@suse.cz \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
--cc=rth@redhat.com \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).