From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7376 invoked by alias); 5 Jul 2013 11:25:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7364 invoked by uid 89); 5 Jul 2013 11:25:46 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz (HELO nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.20.16) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Jul 2013 11:25:37 +0000 Received: by nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix, from userid 16202) id 70F8F5431ED; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 13:25:34 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 11:25:00 -0000 From: Jan Hubicka To: Michael Zolotukhin Cc: =?utf-8?B?T25kxT9laiBCw61sa2E=?= , Jan Hubicka , Uros Bizjak , "H.J. Lu" , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH, x86] Use vector moves in memmove expanding Message-ID: <20130705112534.GA10164@kam.mff.cuni.cz> References: <20130630090647.GA1611@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20130630192209.GA13379@domone.homenet.telecomitalia.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00198.txt.bz2 > > I agree, but anyway we need some tests to measure performance - whether > > these tests are Specs or some others. > > > > > > I attached the updated patch - it's the same as the previous, but > > without emit-rtl.c changes. Is it ok for trunk? Yes, this patch is OK (I meant my previous mail as an approval). There is a lot of things we can do about string operations, taking incremental steps is good plan. Honza