From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-348564-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 5711 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2013 09:13:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5698 invoked by uid 89); 9 Sep 2013 09:13:25 -0000
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 09:13:25 +0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r899DLeB003008	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Mon, 9 Sep 2013 05:13:21 -0400
Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (vpn1-4-75.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.4.75])	by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r899DJrQ024056	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);	Mon, 9 Sep 2013 05:13:21 -0400
Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r899DJh2016488;	Mon, 9 Sep 2013 11:13:19 +0200
Received: (from jakub@localhost)	by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r899DICC016487;	Mon, 9 Sep 2013 11:13:18 +0200
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 09:24:00 -0000
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: "Michael V. Zolotukhin" <michael.v.zolotukhin@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,        Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>,        Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yukhin@gmail.com>,        GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,        Ond??ej B?lka <neleai@seznam.cz>, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, x86] Use vector moves in memmove expanding
Message-ID: <20130909091318.GE1817@tucnak.redhat.com>
Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
References: <7703907.JSoGtmLQkn@polaris> <CAMe9rOrphfykcfD5FApBH-Bp-Wuu8eu7qFQ+256fMgdT0WJcAA@mail.gmail.com> <CANtU079EYp6MH1ZhXVFk9gtC19dCMq37tDer8unwqh65fKy-pg@mail.gmail.com> <20130909072317.GA53568@msticlxl57.ims.intel.com> <20130909072434.GA21984@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20130909074205.GB53568@msticlxl57.ims.intel.com> <20130909074643.GC1817@tucnak.redhat.com> <20130909075249.GC53568@msticlxl57.ims.intel.com> <20130909075902.GD1817@tucnak.redhat.com> <20130909090912.GD53568@msticlxl57.ims.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130909090912.GD53568@msticlxl57.ims.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg00571.txt.bz2

On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 01:09:12PM +0400, Michael V. Zolotukhin wrote:
> I've never written torture tests before, could you please check if I did it
> right?

Please don't introduce new *.x files, for tests where you need something
like that just stick it into gcc.dg/torture/ instead and use normal dg stuff
in there.

So:
/* { dg-do run } */
/* { dg-additional-options "-march=pentiumpro" { target ia32 } } */                                                                                
/* { dg-additional-options "-minline-all-stringops" { target { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } } */                                                        
in gcc.dg/torture/memcpy-1.c would do it.

	Jakub