public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Handle __builtin_unreachable () using assertions in VRP
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:15:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131029135401.GC30970@tucnak.zalov.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1310291219560.11149@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>

On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:28:49PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> Otherwise ok.

So like this?

2013-10-29  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	* tree-cfg.c (assert_unreachable_fallthru_edge_p): New function.
	* tree-cfg.h (assert_unreachable_fallthru_edge_p): New prototype.
	* tree-vrp.c (all_imm_uses_in_stmt_or_feed_cond): New function.
	(remove_range_assertions): If ASSERT_EXPR_VAR has no other immediate
	uses but in the condition and ASSERT_EXPR and the other successor of
	the predecessor bb is __builtin_unreachable (), set_range_info of the
	ASSERT_EXPR_VAR to the range info of the ASSERT_EXPR's lhs.

--- gcc/tree-cfg.c.jj	2013-10-29 09:25:55.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/tree-cfg.c	2013-10-29 14:32:53.235150267 +0100
@@ -380,6 +380,50 @@ computed_goto_p (gimple t)
 	  && TREE_CODE (gimple_goto_dest (t)) != LABEL_DECL);
 }
 
+/* Returns true for edge E where e->src ends with a GIMPLE_COND and
+   the other edge points to a bb with just __builtin_unreachable ().
+   I.e. return true for C->M edge in:
+   <bb C>:
+   ...
+   if (something)
+     goto <bb N>;
+   else
+     goto <bb M>;
+   <bb N>:
+   __builtin_unreachable ();
+   <bb M>:  */
+
+bool
+assert_unreachable_fallthru_edge_p (edge e)
+{
+  basic_block pred_bb = e->src;
+  gimple last = last_stmt (pred_bb);
+  if (last && gimple_code (last) == GIMPLE_COND)
+    {
+      basic_block other_bb = EDGE_SUCC (pred_bb, 0)->dest;
+      if (other_bb == e->dest)
+	other_bb = EDGE_SUCC (pred_bb, 1)->dest;
+      if (EDGE_COUNT (other_bb->succs) == 0)
+	{
+	  gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_after_labels (other_bb);
+	  gimple stmt;
+
+	  if (gsi_end_p (gsi))
+	    return false;
+	  stmt = gsi_stmt (gsi);
+	  if (is_gimple_debug (stmt))
+	    {
+	      gsi_next_nondebug (&gsi);
+	      if (gsi_end_p (gsi))
+		return false;
+	      stmt = gsi_stmt (gsi);
+	    }
+	  return gimple_call_builtin_p (stmt, BUILT_IN_UNREACHABLE);
+	}
+    }
+  return false;
+}
+
 
 /* Search the CFG for any computed gotos.  If found, factor them to a
    common computed goto site.  Also record the location of that site so
--- gcc/tree-vrp.c.jj	2013-10-29 09:25:38.382477963 +0100
+++ gcc/tree-vrp.c	2013-10-29 14:36:23.695060600 +0100
@@ -6459,6 +6459,33 @@ check_all_array_refs (void)
     }
 }
 
+/* Return true if all imm uses of VAR are either in STMT, or
+   feed (optionally through a chain of single imm uses) GIMPLE_COND
+   in basic block COND_BB.  */
+
+static bool
+all_imm_uses_in_stmt_or_feed_cond (tree var, gimple stmt, basic_block cond_bb)
+{
+  use_operand_p use_p, use2_p;
+  imm_use_iterator iter;
+
+  FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_FAST (use_p, iter, var)
+    if (USE_STMT (use_p) != stmt)
+      {
+	gimple use_stmt = USE_STMT (use_p);
+	if (is_gimple_debug (use_stmt))
+	  continue;
+	while (is_gimple_assign (use_stmt)
+	       && single_imm_use (gimple_assign_lhs (use_stmt),
+				  &use2_p, &use_stmt))
+	  ;
+	if (gimple_code (use_stmt) != GIMPLE_COND
+	    || gimple_bb (use_stmt) != cond_bb)
+	  return false;
+      }
+  return true;
+}
+
 /* Convert range assertion expressions into the implied copies and
    copy propagate away the copies.  Doing the trivial copy propagation
    here avoids the need to run the full copy propagation pass after
@@ -6488,12 +6515,16 @@ remove_range_assertions (void)
 {
   basic_block bb;
   gimple_stmt_iterator si;
+  /* 1 if looking at ASSERT_EXPRs immediately at the beginning of
+     a basic block preceeded by GIMPLE_COND branching to it and
+     __builtin_trap, -1 if not yet checked, 0 otherwise.  */
+  int is_unreachable;
 
   /* Note that the BSI iterator bump happens at the bottom of the
      loop and no bump is necessary if we're removing the statement
      referenced by the current BSI.  */
   FOR_EACH_BB (bb)
-    for (si = gsi_start_bb (bb); !gsi_end_p (si);)
+    for (si = gsi_after_labels (bb), is_unreachable = -1; !gsi_end_p (si);)
       {
 	gimple stmt = gsi_stmt (si);
 	gimple use_stmt;
@@ -6501,6 +6532,7 @@ remove_range_assertions (void)
 	if (is_gimple_assign (stmt)
 	    && gimple_assign_rhs_code (stmt) == ASSERT_EXPR)
 	  {
+	    tree lhs = gimple_assign_lhs (stmt);
 	    tree rhs = gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt);
 	    tree var;
 	    tree cond = fold (ASSERT_EXPR_COND (rhs));
@@ -6509,22 +6541,49 @@ remove_range_assertions (void)
 
 	    gcc_assert (cond != boolean_false_node);
 
-	    /* Propagate the RHS into every use of the LHS.  */
 	    var = ASSERT_EXPR_VAR (rhs);
-	    FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_STMT (use_stmt, iter,
-				   gimple_assign_lhs (stmt))
+	    gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (var) == SSA_NAME);
+
+	    if (!POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (lhs))
+		&& SSA_NAME_RANGE_INFO (lhs))
+	      {
+		if (is_unreachable == -1)
+		  {
+		    is_unreachable = 0;
+		    if (single_pred_p (bb)
+			&& assert_unreachable_fallthru_edge_p
+						    (single_pred_edge (bb)))
+		      is_unreachable = 1;
+		  }
+		/* Handle
+		   if (x_7 >= 10 && x_7 < 20)
+		     __builtin_unreachable ();
+		   x_8 = ASSERT_EXPR <x_7, ...>;
+		   if the only uses of x_7 are in the ASSERT_EXPR and
+		   in the condition.  In that case, we can copy the
+		   range info from x_8 computed in this pass also
+		   for x_7.  */
+		if (is_unreachable
+		    && all_imm_uses_in_stmt_or_feed_cond (var, stmt,
+							  single_pred (bb)))
+		  set_range_info (var, SSA_NAME_RANGE_INFO (lhs)->min,
+				  SSA_NAME_RANGE_INFO (lhs)->max);
+	      }
+
+	    /* Propagate the RHS into every use of the LHS.  */
+	    FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_STMT (use_stmt, iter, lhs)
 	      FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_ON_STMT (use_p, iter)
-		{
-		  SET_USE (use_p, var);
-		  gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (var) == SSA_NAME);
-		}
+		SET_USE (use_p, var);
 
 	    /* And finally, remove the copy, it is not needed.  */
 	    gsi_remove (&si, true);
 	    release_defs (stmt);
 	  }
 	else
-	  gsi_next (&si);
+	  {
+	    gsi_next (&si);
+	    is_unreachable = 0;
+	  }
       }
 }
 
--- gcc/tree-cfg.h.jj	2013-10-21 09:00:52.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/tree-cfg.h	2013-10-29 14:17:52.927812547 +0100
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ extern bool is_ctrl_stmt (gimple);
 extern bool is_ctrl_altering_stmt (gimple);
 extern bool simple_goto_p (gimple);
 extern bool stmt_ends_bb_p (gimple);
+extern bool assert_unreachable_fallthru_edge_p (edge);
 extern void delete_tree_cfg_annotations (void);
 extern gimple first_stmt (basic_block);
 extern gimple last_stmt (basic_block);


	Jakub

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-29 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-25  9:13 Jakub Jelinek
2013-10-29 12:05 ` Richard Biener
2013-10-29 14:15   ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2013-10-29 14:41     ` Richard Biener
2013-11-04  1:00     ` Tom de Vries
2013-11-04 10:46       ` Tom de Vries

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131029135401.GC30970@tucnak.zalov.cz \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).