public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
To: Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net>
Cc: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][ubsan] Add VLA bound instrumentation
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 22:46:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131030221548.GD31396@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8CFC1A6E-0922-4F40-A9D4-14C2E9F8E848@comcast.net>

Thanks Mike.

I had a quick look at the CLEANUP_STMT and cp-tree.def says
"A CLEANUP_STMT marks the point at which a declaration is fully
constructed.", while doc says
"Used to represent an action that should take place upon exit from the
enclosing scope.  Typically, these actions are calls to destructors for
local objects."  Huh?  So, how come it e.g. initializes variables, and on
the other hand it should run dtors?  I'm baffled (but it's too late for me
to think clearly ;)).

	Marek

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-30 22:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-12 12:38 Marek Polacek
2013-09-12 12:48 ` Marek Polacek
2013-09-12 16:12 ` Joseph S. Myers
2013-09-12 16:20   ` Joseph S. Myers
2013-09-12 17:15     ` Marek Polacek
2013-09-13 10:29     ` Marek Polacek
2013-09-13 11:23       ` Eric Botcazou
2013-09-13 18:01       ` Joseph S. Myers
2013-09-16 11:13     ` Marek Polacek
2013-09-16 13:39     ` Florian Weimer
2013-09-12 16:29   ` Marek Polacek
2013-09-25 13:23 ` Marek Polacek
2013-10-07 20:17   ` Marek Polacek
2013-10-15 13:25     ` Marek Polacek
2013-10-15 15:01       ` Joseph S. Myers
2013-10-24 20:35   ` Jason Merrill
2013-10-25 17:38     ` Marek Polacek
2013-10-25 19:04       ` Jason Merrill
2013-10-25 19:15         ` Marek Polacek
2013-10-25 19:30           ` Jason Merrill
2013-10-30 15:16             ` Marek Polacek
2013-10-30 16:08               ` Jason Merrill
2013-10-30 16:20                 ` Marek Polacek
2013-10-30 20:55                   ` Mike Stump
2013-10-30 22:46                     ` Marek Polacek [this message]
2013-10-30 22:50                       ` Mike Stump
2013-10-31 11:12                         ` Marek Polacek
2013-10-31  3:18                   ` Jason Merrill
2013-10-31 19:07                     ` Marek Polacek
2013-11-01 17:35                       ` Jason Merrill
2013-11-01 19:10                         ` Marek Polacek
2013-11-01 20:39                           ` Jason Merrill
2013-11-02 13:06                             ` Marek Polacek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131030221548.GD31396@redhat.com \
    --to=polacek@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=mikestump@comcast.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).