From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22947 invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2014 15:05:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22930 invoked by uid 89); 24 Jan 2014 15:05:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_MXURI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail.ud10.udmedia.de Received: from ud10.udmedia.de (HELO mail.ud10.udmedia.de) (194.117.254.50) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 15:05:36 +0000 Received: (qmail 4151 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2014 16:05:32 +0100 Received: from unknown (HELO x4) (ud10?360p3@91.64.96.185) by mail.ud10.udmedia.de with ESMTPSA (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 24 Jan 2014 16:05:32 +0100 Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 15:05:00 -0000 From: Markus Trippelsdorf To: Dodji Seketeli Cc: Bernd Edlinger , Jakub Jelinek , GCC Patches , Tom Tromey , Manuel =?iso-8859-1?B?TPNwZXotSWLh8WV6?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] preprocessor/58580 - preprocessor goes OOM with warning for zero literals Message-ID: <20140124150532.GB396@x4> References: <87y559xz7y.fsf@redhat.com> <20131031173649.GW27813@tucnak.zalov.cz> <87zjpbb5qu.fsf@redhat.com> <20131111142159.GZ27813@tucnak.zalov.cz> <878uwuap4f.fsf@redhat.com> <878uwt63e2.fsf@redhat.com> <20131113081610.GH27813@tucnak.zalov.cz> <87zjp7t73c.fsf@redhat.com> <87vbxcig8t.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87vbxcig8t.fsf@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg01585.txt.bz2 On 2014.01.22 at 09:16 +0100, Dodji Seketeli wrote: > Bernd Edlinger writes: > > > Hi, > > Hello, > > > since there was no progress in the last 2 months on that matter, > > Sorry, this is my bad. I got sidetracked by something else and forgot > that I had the patch working et al, and all its bits that need approval > got approved. It still can go in right now. It improves performance > and fixes the issue the way it was discussed. > > Here it is, regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu against trunk. > > If nobody objects in the next 24 hours, I'll commit it. The patch causes http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59935 . The follow-up patch (fp == NULL check) doesn't help. -- Markus