From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31629 invoked by alias); 5 May 2014 19:17:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31617 invoked by uid 89); 5 May 2014 19:17:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 May 2014 19:17:03 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s45JH1xk001432 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 5 May 2014 15:17:02 -0400 Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-116-116.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.116]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s45JGxlf016671 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 5 May 2014 15:17:00 -0400 Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.14.8/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s45JGvfV011263; Mon, 5 May 2014 21:16:57 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id s45JGttv011262; Mon, 5 May 2014 21:16:55 +0200 Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 19:17:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, rdsandiford@googlemail.com Subject: Re: Ping: RFA: speeding up dg-extract-results.sh Message-ID: <20140505191655.GP1817@tucnak.redhat.com> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <878utfe5g0.fsf@talisman.default> <878uqjtixc.fsf@talisman.default> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <878uqjtixc.fsf@talisman.default> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00243.txt.bz2 On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 08:34:07AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Ping for this old patch. I didn't ping it before because I can imagine > it wasn't a good idea at that stage in 4.8. But I've been using it locally > since and it really does make a big difference when testing lots of > multilibs. Have you tested that it creates bitwise identical output given the same input from the old script on a couple of regtests (e.g. your 5 hour mips case with many multilibs, and say common x86_64 one)? Jakub