From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27055 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2014 22:39:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27016 invoked by uid 89); 26 Jun 2014 22:39:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 22:39:02 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s5QMd0Ri001304 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 26 Jun 2014 18:39:00 -0400 Received: from localhost (vpn1-4-174.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.4.174]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s5QMcxFw003590; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 18:38:59 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 22:39:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Wakely To: Paolo Carlini Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Dumont , "libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org" , gcc-patches Subject: Re: testsuite allocators patch Message-ID: <20140626223858.GK2711@redhat.com> References: <53A49B7C.5080506@gmail.com> <53AB276F.10806@gmail.com> <20140626103353.GA1725@redhat.com> <53AC8678.5060706@gmail.com> <53AC8ED5.3070000@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53AC8ED5.3070000@oracle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg02168.txt.bz2 On 26/06/14 23:21 +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote: >Hi, > >I'm afraid something went badly wrong with this commit, I'm seeing >tens of fails. See eg: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-06/msg02439.html It seems that uneq_allocator is no longer copy constructible.