From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2052 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2014 16:37:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2024 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jun 2014 16:37:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz Received: from nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz (HELO nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.20.16) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:37:12 +0000 Received: by nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix, from userid 16202) id 0B3D9541663; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 18:37:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:37:00 -0000 From: Jan Hubicka To: Jason Merrill Cc: Jan Hubicka , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [C++] Avoid producing duplicate binfos for member pointers Message-ID: <20140630163708.GA646@kam.mff.cuni.cz> References: <20140628232650.GB6942@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <53B15B20.8040206@redhat.com> <53B18909.6010606@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53B18909.6010606@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg02417.txt.bz2 > On 06/30/2014 08:42 AM, Jason Merrill wrote: > >Hmm, I wonder why we need BINFOs at all for the ptrmemfunc RECORD_TYPEs, > >which are not classes. > > I'm working on removing both BINFO and TYPE_LANG_SPECIFIC. Works for me! :) Thanks, Honza