From: Trevor Saunders <tsaunders@mozilla.com>
To: "Martin Liška" <mliska@suse.cz>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] IPA ICF pass
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 23:45:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140701234501.GA21606@tsaunders-iceball.corp.tor1.mozilla.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53B15254.2040003@suse.cz>
> diff --git a/gcc/ipa-icf.c b/gcc/ipa-icf.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..8a13dca
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/ipa-icf.c
> +/* Itializes internal structures according to given number of
initialize
> + if (is_a_helper<cgraph_node *>::test (node))
shouldn't you just use is_a<cgraph_node*> (node) ?
> +sem_item_optimizer::filter_removed_items (void)
> +{
> + vec <sem_item *> filtered;
> + filtered.create (m_items.length());
use auto_vec here?
> + m_items.release ();
> +
> + for (unsigned int i = 0; i < filtered.length(); i++)
> + m_items.safe_push (filtered[i]);
hrm, maybe adding vec::swap makes sense.
> + if (c->members.length() > 1)
> + {
> + vec <sem_item *> new_vector;
> + new_vector.create (c->members.length ());
same comment about auto_vec and swap.
> +bool
> +sem_item_optimizer::release_split_map (__attribute__((__unused__)) congruence_class *
> + const &cls,
> + __attribute__((__unused__)) bitmap const &b,
that one is definitly used
> + __attribute__((__unused__)) traverse_split_pair *pair)
Why can't you just leave the arguments unnamed to fix the warning?
> +sem_item_optimizer::do_congruence_step_for_index (congruence_class *cls,
> + unsigned int index)
> +{
> + hash_map <congruence_class *, bitmap> *split_map =
> + new hash_map <congruence_class *, bitmap> ();
why aren't you putting the hash_map on the stack? in any case it looks
like you fail to delete it when your done with it.
> diff --git a/gcc/ipa-icf.h b/gcc/ipa-icf.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..d328dd6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/ipa-icf.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,743 @@
> +/* Prints string STRING to a FILE with a given number of SPACE_COUNT. */
> +#define FPUTS_SPACES(file, space_count, string) \
> + do \
> + { \
> + fprintf (file, "%*s" string, space_count, " "); \
seems like you could do this with a static inline function.
> +/* Prints a MESSAGE to dump_file if exists. */
> +#define SE_DUMP_MESSAGE(message) \
> + do \
> + { \
> + if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS)) \
> + fprintf (dump_file, " debug message: %s (%s:%u)\n", message, __func__, __LINE__); \
a inline function that used the builtins like the memory statis stuff
might be slightly less ugly imho
> +/* Logs a MESSAGE to dump_file if exists and returns false. */
> +#define SE_EXIT_FALSE_WITH_MSG(message) \
> + do \
> + { \
> + if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS)) \
> + fprintf (dump_file, " false returned: '%s' (%s:%u)\n", message, __func__, __LINE__); \
> + return false; \
> + } \
> + while (false);
ugh macros that effect control flow, instead maybe define a inline
function that does the logging and then returns the value you want your
function to return so you can write
if (whatever)
return SE_LOG (NULL, "something or other");
?
> +/* Forward declaration for sem_func class. */
> +class sem_item;
comment is wrong, and imho useless.
> + /* Initializes internal structures according to given number of
> + source and target SSA names. The number of source names is SSA_SOURCE,
> + respectively SSA_TARGET. */
> + func_checker (unsigned ssa_source, unsigned sss_target);
ssa_target?
> + /* Source to target edge map. */
> + hash_map <edge, edge> *m_edge_map;
is there a reason to not embedd these in the object? you seem to create
them in the ctor and delete them in the dtor, so I expect they have teh
same lifetime.
> +/* Basic block struct for sematic equality pass. */
semantic?
> +typedef struct sem_bb
you don't need the typedef in C++
> + /* Item type. */
> + enum sem_item_type type;
loose the enum keyword since you don't need it?
> +class sem_function: public sem_item
> +{
> + /* COMPARED_FUNC is a function that we compare to. */
> + sem_function *m_compared_func;
this feels like a weird place for this, would func_checker maybe make
more sense as a place to put it?
> +class sem_variable: public sem_item
> +{
> + /* Initializes references to other semantic functions/variables. */
> + inline virtual void init_refs ()
iirc defining with in a class definition implies inline.
> +typedef struct congruence_class_group
> +{
> + hashval_t hash;
> + sem_item_type type;
> + vec <congruence_class *> classes;
> +} congruence_class_group_t;
lose the typedef?
> + /* Returns true if a congruence class CLS is presented in worklist. */
s/presented/present/ ?
Trev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-01 23:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-16 10:07 [PATCH 1/5] New Identical Code Folding IPA pass mliska
2014-06-16 10:07 ` [PATCH 4/5] Existing tests fix mliska
2014-06-17 19:52 ` Jeff Law
2014-06-17 20:50 ` Rainer Orth
2014-06-18 9:02 ` Martin Liška
2014-06-30 12:12 ` Martin Liška
2014-09-26 12:21 ` Martin Liška
2014-06-16 10:07 ` [PATCH 5/5] New tests introduction mliska
2014-06-17 19:53 ` Jeff Law
2014-06-30 12:14 ` Martin Liška
2014-10-19 8:19 ` Andreas Schwab
2014-10-23 12:34 ` Martin Liška
2014-06-16 10:07 ` [PATCH 2/5] Existing call graph infrastructure enhancement mliska
2014-06-17 20:00 ` Jeff Law
2014-06-30 11:49 ` Martin Liška
2014-06-30 18:54 ` Jeff Law
2014-07-17 14:54 ` Martin Liška
2014-08-25 9:56 ` Martin Liška
2014-08-25 16:12 ` Jan Hubicka
2014-08-27 21:12 ` Jeff Law
2014-09-24 14:23 ` Martin Liška
2014-09-24 15:01 ` Jan Hubicka
2014-09-26 10:19 ` Martin Liška
2014-06-16 10:07 ` [PATCH 3/5] IPA ICF pass mliska
2014-06-20 7:32 ` Trevor Saunders
2014-06-26 11:18 ` Martin Liška
2014-07-05 21:44 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2014-07-05 22:53 ` Jan Hubicka
2014-07-17 15:23 ` Martin Liška
2014-09-26 12:20 ` Martin Liška
2014-09-26 14:44 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-09-26 23:27 ` Jan Hubicka
2014-09-27 5:59 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-09-27 7:47 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-09-27 10:46 ` Martin Liška
2014-09-27 10:37 ` Martin Liška
2014-09-28 2:21 ` Jan Hubicka
2014-10-10 23:54 ` Fakturace
2014-10-11 0:02 ` Martin Liška
2014-10-11 8:23 ` Jan Hubicka
2014-10-13 13:20 ` Martin Liška
2014-10-13 13:29 ` Jan Hubicka
2014-09-27 10:32 ` Martin Liška
2014-09-26 20:47 ` Jan Hubicka
2014-10-11 0:08 ` Martin Liška
2014-10-11 8:26 ` Jan Hubicka
2014-10-13 15:17 ` Martin Liška
2014-10-14 16:12 ` Jan Hubicka
2014-10-15 17:06 ` Martin Liška
2014-10-22 21:20 ` Jiong Wang
2014-11-06 3:01 ` Joey Ye
2014-11-06 9:03 ` Jan Hubicka
2014-11-13 22:26 ` H.J. Lu
2015-01-20 21:29 ` H.J. Lu
2014-09-26 22:27 ` Jan Hubicka
2014-10-11 0:23 ` Martin Liška
2014-10-11 9:05 ` Jan Hubicka
2014-06-24 20:31 ` Jeff Law
2014-06-26 16:02 ` Martin Liška
2014-06-26 18:46 ` Jan Hubicka
2014-06-30 12:05 ` Martin Liška
2014-07-01 23:45 ` Trevor Saunders [this message]
2014-06-30 19:06 ` Jeff Law
2014-06-17 19:49 ` [PATCH 1/5] New Identical Code Folding IPA pass Jeff Law
2014-06-18 19:05 ` Jan Hubicka
2014-06-17 20:09 ` Paolo Carlini
2014-06-18 8:46 ` Martin Liška
2014-06-18 8:49 ` Paolo Carlini
2014-06-17 20:17 ` David Malcolm
2014-06-18 8:10 ` Martin Liška
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140701234501.GA21606@tsaunders-iceball.corp.tor1.mozilla.com \
--to=tsaunders@mozilla.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=mliska@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).