public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Jason Merrill <Jason@redhat.com>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
	       "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>,
	       Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@redhat.com>,
	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,        libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] -Wmemset-transposed-args (PR middle-end/61294)
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 20:32:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140708203151.GP31640@tucnak.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p35hitgbscyj3xuum5kryq1g.1404847489032@email.android.com>

On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 03:24:52PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> I don't think we want to warn about e.g. 1-1, only about literal 0.

Well, at least literal 0 and '\0'.  In any case, it seems both the C and C++
FEs fold the arguments too early, already during the parsing of the argument
list.  In the C FE, there is original_code in the c_expr struct, so perhaps
I could somehow propagate it to the caller for the first few arguments
and test that original_code is INTEGER_CST in addition to integer_zerop
to check for literal 0.
But in the C++ FE there isn't something like that.  Do you think we
shouldn't warn even if e.g. the last argument is a template parameter
that turns out to be 0, so warn only during parsing and check for literal
0 and not warn again during instantiation?  Any suggestions how to find out
if it was literal 0 or something that folded to 0 in the C++ FE?

	Jakub

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-07-08 20:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-08 12:50 Jakub Jelinek
2014-07-08 19:25 ` Jason Merrill
2014-07-08 19:38   ` Carlos O'Donell
2014-07-08 20:32   ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2014-07-08 22:33     ` Jason Merrill
2014-07-09 10:26       ` Richard Biener
2014-07-09 10:33         ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-07-09 10:51           ` Richard Biener
2014-07-09 11:09             ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-07-08 19:34 ` Carlos O'Donell
2014-07-09 14:40 Manuel López-Ibáñez
2014-07-09 21:28 ` Jason Merrill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140708203151.GP31640@tucnak.redhat.com \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=Jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=siddhesh@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).