From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7167 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2014 15:49:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7145 invoked by uid 89); 24 Aug 2014 15:49:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: troutmask.apl.washington.edu Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (HELO troutmask.apl.washington.edu) (128.95.76.21) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 15:49:17 +0000 Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7OFnEct046142 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 24 Aug 2014 08:49:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id s7OFnDww046141; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 08:49:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 15:49:00 -0000 From: Steve Kargl To: VandeVondele Joost Cc: Gerald Pfeifer , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/62245 fix INT docs. Message-ID: <20140824154913.GA46132@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <908103EDB4893A42920B21D3568BFD9312F37DC4@MBX23.d.ethz.ch> <908103EDB4893A42920B21D3568BFD9312F3ADDE@MBX23.d.ethz.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <908103EDB4893A42920B21D3568BFD9312F3ADDE@MBX23.d.ethz.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg02284.txt.bz2 On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 12:47:18PM +0000, VandeVondele Joost wrote: > > One small ask: these lines are too long (already before your patch); > > can you please reformat those lines your patch touches to <80 columns? > > sure: > > +of @var{A} and whose sign is the same as the sign of @var{A}. The result > +is undefined if it can not be represented as an @code{INTEGER} of the > +given @code{KIND}. The last sentence above is not needed. There is a general prohibition in 13.7.1 against calling INT(A) with |A| > HUGE(1_4). -- Steve