From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: parallel check output changes?
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:08:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140918130109.GH17454@tucnak.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <541AD692.4030907@redhat.com>
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 08:56:50AM -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> Has the changes that have gone into the check parallelization made the .sum
> file non-deterministic?
> I'm seeing a lot of small hunks in different orders which cause my
> comparison scripts to show big differences.
> I haven't been paying attention to the nature of the make check changes so
> Im not sure if this is expected...
>
> Or is this something else? Its the same code base between runs, just with a
> few changes made to some include files.
I'm using contrib/test_summary and haven't seen any non-determinisms in the
output of that command. As for dg-extract-results.sh, we have two versions
of that, one if you have python 2.6 or newer, another one if you don't.
Perhaps the behavior of those two (I'm using the python version probably)
differs?
Jakub
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-18 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-18 12:56 Andrew MacLeod
2014-09-18 13:08 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2014-09-18 13:05 ` Andrew MacLeod
2014-09-18 15:45 ` Andrew MacLeod
2014-09-18 17:33 ` Bernd Schmidt
2014-09-18 17:36 ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-09-18 18:45 ` Segher Boessenkool
2014-09-19 9:37 ` Segher Boessenkool
2014-09-19 16:32 ` Mike Stump
2014-09-23 15:33 ` Richard Sandiford
2014-09-23 15:43 ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-09-24 14:55 ` Andrew MacLeod
2014-09-24 16:11 ` Segher Boessenkool
2014-09-24 16:29 ` Andrew MacLeod
2014-09-24 17:59 ` Andrew MacLeod
2014-09-25 12:22 ` Andrew MacLeod
2014-09-25 17:02 ` Segher Boessenkool
2014-10-02 16:47 ` Segher Boessenkool
2014-10-02 17:05 ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-10-02 17:46 ` Richard Sandiford
2014-10-02 18:00 ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-10-04 10:32 ` Richard Sandiford
2014-10-05 17:53 ` Mike Stump
2014-10-02 18:15 ` Segher Boessenkool
2014-10-02 19:05 ` Andrew MacLeod
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140918130109.GH17454@tucnak.redhat.com \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=amacleod@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).