From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22229 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2014 16:11:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22214 invoked by uid 89); 24 Sep 2014 16:11:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: gate.crashing.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (HELO gate.crashing.org) (63.228.1.57) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 16:11:00 +0000 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s8OGAgm3028869; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:10:42 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id s8OGAdQC028857; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:10:39 -0500 Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 16:11:00 -0000 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Andrew MacLeod Cc: Jakub Jelinek , Bernd Schmidt , gcc-patches , richard.sandiford@arm.com Subject: Re: parallel check output changes? Message-ID: <20140924161039.GA27079@gate.crashing.org> References: <541AD692.4030907@redhat.com> <20140918130109.GH17454@tucnak.redhat.com> <541AD880.7080703@redhat.com> <541AF451.3070406@redhat.com> <541B1710.8060809@codesourcery.com> <20140918173609.GM17454@tucnak.redhat.com> <20140918184455.GB28595@gate.crashing.org> <20140919093723.GA26414@gate.crashing.org> <87iokel5c0.fsf@e105548-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <5422DB41.1090800@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5422DB41.1090800@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg02146.txt.bz2 On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:54:57AM -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote: > On 09/23/2014 11:33 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > >Your patch instead sorts based on the full test name, including options, > >which means that the output no longer matches what you'd get from a > >non-parallel run. AFAICT, it also no longer matches what you'd get from > >the .sh version. That might be OK, just thought I'd mention it. With the parallellisation changes the output was pretty random order. My patch made that a fixed order again, albeit a different one from before. > Is this suppose to be resolved now? I'm still seeing some issues with a > branch cut from mainline from yesterday. This is from the following > sequence: > > check out revision 215511 , build, make -j16 check, make -j16 check, > then compare all the .sum files: I don't understand what exactly you did; you have left out some steps I think? Segher