From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27673 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2014 09:12:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27660 invoked by uid 89); 9 Oct 2014 09:12:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 09:12:15 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s999CD8l005479 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 9 Oct 2014 05:12:13 -0400 Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-116-116.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.116]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s999CBFt008504 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 9 Oct 2014 05:12:13 -0400 Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s999CAGB003673; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 11:12:10 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id s999C8S2003672; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 11:12:08 +0200 Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 09:12:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Phil Muldoon Cc: Jeff Law , Tom Tromey , tom@tromey.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] add libcc1 Message-ID: <20141009091208.GL1986@tucnak.redhat.com> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <1400254001-12038-1-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> <87oayx4l0x.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87bntobp1f.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <53D9CA7B.3040709@redhat.com> <5436504B.8060902@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5436504B.8060902@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00757.txt.bz2 On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 10:07:23AM +0100, Phil Muldoon wrote: > >> 2014-06-19 Phil Muldoon > >> Tom Tromey > > > So my biggest concern here is long term maintenance -- who's going to own care and feeding of these bits over time. > > Sorry for taking so long to reply. We've talked, on irc and elsewhere > a little (some at the Cauldron too!). I think the consensus is as > nobody has explicitly mentioned anything, this is OK to go in? So to > be a pain, I think we should get an archivable "OK to check-in" and > that I, or other members of the Red Hat team (or anyone else that The series is ok for trunk. Please retest it before checking in. > > Does this deserve a mention in the news file? > > I am not sure. All the interface to this is really through GDB. > I'll let someone else tell me yes or no for news. The patch set I have on my > desk is ready to go, and I believe all alterations have been approved > in previous email threads. Yeah, I think it belongs into GDB news file probably, because that is the place where it is user visible. Jakub