Re: [RFC: Patch, PR 60102] [4.9/4.10 Regression] powerpc fp-bit ices@dwf_regno

["Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>]

rohitarulraj wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Maciej W. Rozycki [mailto:macro@codesourcery.com]
> > To: Ulrich Weigand
> > Cc: Dharmakan Rohit-B30502; Wienskoski Edmar-RA8797; David Edelsohn; gcc-
> > patches@gcc.gnu.org; Alan Modra; Jakub Jelinek
> > Subject: Re: [RFC: Patch, PR 60102] [4.9/4.10 Regression] powerpc fp-bit
> > ices@dwf_regno
> [snip]
> > >
> > > Rohit, could you verify whether this fixes the SPE problem?
> >=20
> >  Thanks for your work, I have applied your change to my 4.9 setup, rebuil=
> t the
> > compiler and smoke-tested it with gdb.base/store.exp and my e500v2 multil=
> ib
> > only; powerpc-linux-gnu target.  Unfortunately your patch hasn't changed
> > anything, the same failures remain.
> >=20
> >  Just to be sure I haven't missed anything I reverted your change and Roh=
> it's
> > one as well, rebuilt the compiler and rerun this testing and this time al=
> l failures
> > were gone.  So it looks like your fix didn't completely cover the damage =
> Rohit's
> > change caused. :(
> 
> Ulrich/Maciej,
> 
> The patch works for me.
> Tested with GCC v4.9 branch rev 216036 and GCC trunk rev 216027.

Thanks for testing!  Can you work with Maciej to find out why he's
seeing different results?

Bye,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain
  Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com