public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Yury Gribov <y.gribov@samsung.com>
Cc: Maxim Ostapenko <m.ostapenko@partner.samsung.com>,
	       GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	       Slava Garbuzov <v.garbuzov@samsung.com>,
	       Maxim Ostapenko <chefmax7@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] Don't expand string/memory builtins if ASan is enabled.
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:37:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141027143458.GW10376@tucnak.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5448BBC8.9060807@samsung.com>

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:26:48PM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote:
> On 10/21/2014 05:26 PM, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >this is the second version of the patch. Here the major changes from the
> >previous one:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> >      case BUILT_IN_BCMP:
> >+      *intercepted_p = false;
> 
> The code which identifies interceptors seems to be duplicated in
> expand_builtin.  What about factoring this out to some is_asan_intercepted()
> in asan.h?

I agree.

BTW, when you handle a builtin, but set *intercepted_p to false, is the
point just that you don't instrument e.g. scalar accesses to that memory
region afterwards?  I mean:
memcpy (p, "abc", 3);
p[0] = 'd';
you don't really have to instrument p[0] store, because supposedly memcpy
call has already verified p[0] through p[2] is writable.

	Jakub

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-27 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <5441008A.2010706@partner.samsung.com>
2014-10-17 11:47 ` [PATCH] " Maxim Ostapenko
2014-10-17 12:29   ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-10-17 13:03     ` Yury Gribov
2014-10-17 13:08       ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-10-21 13:38         ` [PATCHv2] " Maxim Ostapenko
2014-10-23  8:51           ` Yury Gribov
2014-10-27 14:37             ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2014-10-28  9:27               ` Maxim Ostapenko
2014-10-28  9:35                 ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-11-11 23:51                 ` H.J. Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141027143458.GW10376@tucnak.redhat.com \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=chefmax7@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=m.ostapenko@partner.samsung.com \
    --cc=v.garbuzov@samsung.com \
    --cc=y.gribov@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).