From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14272 invoked by alias); 10 Nov 2014 14:00:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14222 invoked by uid 89); 10 Nov 2014 14:00:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com Received: from e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com (HELO e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com) (195.75.94.109) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:00:13 +0000 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:00:10 -0000 Received: from d06dlp03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.20.15) by e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.143) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:00:06 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by d06dlp03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693971B08061 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:00:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av08.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av08.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.249]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id sAAE06SZ65667250 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:00:06 GMT Received: from d06av08.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av08.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id sAAE054q023289 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 07:00:05 -0700 Received: from bl3ahm9f.de.ibm.com (dyn-9-152-212-86.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.212.86]) by d06av08.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id sAAE05XE023263 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 10 Nov 2014 07:00:05 -0700 Received: from dvogt by bl3ahm9f.de.ibm.com with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XnpVk-0000ee-TB; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 15:00:04 +0100 Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:24:00 -0000 From: Dominik Vogt To: gcc-patches , "gofrontend-dev@googlegroups.com" Cc: Ian Taylor Subject: Re: [gofrontend-dev] [PATCH 4/4] Gccgo port to s390[x] -- part II Message-ID: <20141110140004.GA515@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: vogt@linux.vnet.ibm.com Mail-Followup-To: gcc-patches , "gofrontend-dev@googlegroups.com" , Ian Taylor References: <20141104121552.GE19710@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20141105100511.GB3520@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20141106120425.GA19995@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 14111014-0013-0000-0000-000001CC36C0 X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg00799.txt.bz2 > I'd still like to avoid the rampant duplication if possible. One > approach would be to put most of the test in something like > nilptr_tests.go marked with "// skip". Then we can have top-level > nilptrXX.go tests with +build lines that use "// run nilptr_tests.go". I fail to see how that could be done with "// run". There is one example use, namely cmplxdivide.go". That is not run in gcc because the "run" line does not match anything in go-test.exp. If I add a rule for that, how does that help me to compile a test that consists of multiple files? At the moment, I've no idea how to tackle the multi file problem with the existing go-test.exp. Ciao Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt IBM Germany