From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30286 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2014 18:44:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30185 invoked by uid 89); 21 Nov 2014 18:44:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-wi0-f172.google.com Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f172.google.com) (209.85.212.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 18:44:55 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id n3so137314wiv.11 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 10:44:52 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.174.40 with SMTP id bp8mr10246017wjc.104.1416595492250; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 10:44:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from msticlxl57.ims.intel.com (fmdmzpr01-ext.fm.intel.com. [192.55.54.36]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id mc10sm166482wic.24.2014.11.21.10.44.49 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 21 Nov 2014 10:44:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 18:59:00 -0000 From: Ilya Verbin To: Bernd Edlinger Cc: Kirill Yukhin , Andrey Turetskiy , Jakub Jelinek , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] OpenMP 4.0 offloading to Intel MIC: non-fallback testing Message-ID: <20141121184440.GA63468@msticlxl57.ims.intel.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg02832.txt.bz2 Hi, On 21 Nov 19:19, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > so, did you really regenerate Makefile.in in that patch, or am I missing something ? You're right. This patch was rebased so many times, that we may forget to regenerate it before committing. Do you plan to submit any patch for Makefile.in? Or should I post this change separately for review? (with regtesting) -- Ilya