From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6497 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2014 21:54:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6485 invoked by uid 89); 25 Nov 2014 21:54:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: gate.crashing.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (HELO gate.crashing.org) (63.228.1.57) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 21:54:51 +0000 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id sAPLslOI014117; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 15:54:47 -0600 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id sAPLskOE014112; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 15:54:46 -0600 Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 22:38:00 -0000 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Jeff Law Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] combine: distribute_log_links for PARALLELs of SETs Message-ID: <20141125215441.GA13266@gate.crashing.org> References: <07a14f524da96447dadd570ebf7ee568627aa611.1415984897.git.segher@kernel.crashing.org> <5474DA95.6060006@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5474DA95.6060006@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg03192.txt.bz2 On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:37:57PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > This is OK once prereqs are approved. That is only 3/5 now. > You might consider pushing the two LOG_LINKs related patches forward > independently of the patch to rip apart the PARALLELs. Though I think > that all of the patches are pretty close to being approved. Your call. I probably will; 2/5 (the "rip" patch) needs updating, and my patch stack is much too high :-) Not that [34]/5 do terribly much without 2/5. Thanks for all the reviews, Segher