From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-386535-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 5544 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2014 11:57:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5533 invoked by uid 89); 4 Dec 2014 11:57:39 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 11:57:38 +0000
Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sB4BvbhL016166	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL);	Thu, 4 Dec 2014 06:57:37 -0500
Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-116-21.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.21])	by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sB4BvZul017490	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO);	Thu, 4 Dec 2014 06:57:37 -0500
Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sB4BvYHU009183;	Thu, 4 Dec 2014 12:57:34 +0100
Received: (from jakub@localhost)	by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id sB4BvXCP009182;	Thu, 4 Dec 2014 12:57:33 +0100
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 11:57:00 -0000
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: Ilya Tocar <tocarip.intel@gmail.com>, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>,        GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH x86] Enable v64qi permutations.
Message-ID: <20141204115733.GA1923@tucnak.redhat.com>
Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
References: <20141204094959.GA67582@msticlxl7.ims.intel.com> <CAMe9rOoQ+TiWhZEeMS0_9KZ_+pti8AFDRD56Jv7wj5PUqvdr3w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOoQ+TiWhZEeMS0_9KZ_+pti8AFDRD56Jv7wj5PUqvdr3w@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg00364.txt.bz2

On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 03:54:25AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Ilya Tocar <tocarip.intel@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As discussed in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg00473.html
> > This patch enables v64qi permutations.
> > I've checked  vshuf* tests from dg-torture.exp,
> > with avx512* options on sde and generated permutations are correct.
> >
> > OK for trunk?
> >
> 
> Can you add a few testcases?

Isn't it already covered by gcc.dg/torture/vshuf* ?

	Jakub