From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-387732-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 27543 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2014 17:37:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27532 invoked by uid 89); 18 Dec 2014 17:37:42 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: cam-smtp0.cambridge.arm.com
Received: from fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com (HELO cam-smtp0.cambridge.arm.com) (217.140.96.140) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:37:41 +0000
Received: from arm.com (e106375-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.203.34])	by cam-smtp0.cambridge.arm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id sBIHbbkS005690;	Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:37:37 GMT
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:38:00 -0000
From: James Greenhalgh <james.greenhalgh@arm.com>
To: Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,        Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com>,        Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][ARM][doc] Remove mention of Advanced RISC Machines
Message-ID: <20141218173737.GA29904@arm.com>
References: <548879B8.6010705@arm.com> <54930C5A.90008@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <54930C5A.90008@arm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg01561.txt.bz2

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 05:18:18PM +0000, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Ping.
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg00947.html

This patch almost certainly falls under the obvious rule:

  "will the person who objects to my work the most be able to
   find a fault with my fix?"

ARM hasn't stood for "Advanced RISC Machines" since 1998, so I can't see
even your most fervent nemesis objecting to this one!

Cheers,
James

> 
> Thanks,
> Kyrill
> On 10/12/14 16:50, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The company ARM is not Advanced RISC Machines anymore and anyway the ARM
> > architecture is distinct from the company.
> > This patch adjusts the documentation accordingly.
> >
> > Ok?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kyrill
> >
> > 2014-12-10  Kyrylo Tkachov  <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
> >
> >       * doc/invoke.texi (ARM options): Remove mention of Advanced RISC
> >       Machines.
> 
> 
>