From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23107 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2014 12:36:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23096 invoked by uid 89); 22 Dec 2014 12:36:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:36:08 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sBMCa5c8001081 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 22 Dec 2014 07:36:05 -0500 Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-116-64.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.64]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sBMCa2OE027189 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Dec 2014 07:36:04 -0500 Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBMCZtW5022601; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 13:35:56 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id sBMCZrFc022600; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 13:35:53 +0100 Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:50:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Thomas Schwinge Cc: Ilya Verbin , Kirill Yukhin , Andrey Turetskiy , gcc Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] OpenMP 4.0 offloading to Intel MIC: non-fallback testing Message-ID: <20141222123553.GK1667@tucnak.redhat.com> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <20141021171323.GA47586@msticlxl57.ims.intel.com> <20141030114001.GA34120@msticlxl57.ims.intel.com> <87tx0t0yh5.fsf@kepler.schwinge.homeip.net> <87oaqvzz0n.fsf@kepler.schwinge.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87oaqvzz0n.fsf@kepler.schwinge.homeip.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg01758.txt.bz2 On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 12:48:08PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > In my understanding, we'd like to support the modes that either all > compilers are installed (which is what a user will be using), or all are > tested from their build trees. Or, do we also have to support the mode > that only the offloading compilers are installed, but the target > (offloading host) compiler is not? (Doesn't make much sense to me.) All 3 of these, yes. The nothing is installed yet mode supposedly doesn't work properly on the trunk yet (and is what I'd like to use e.g. in distro rpm builds), the offloading compilers installed, host is not is useful that you actually test the host compiler before installing, and that supposedly works on the trunk, the all installed testing I've never used myself, but some people are using it. Jakub