From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6808 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2015 17:04:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6798 invoked by uid 89); 8 Jan 2015 17:04:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 17:04:43 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t08H4eRO019983 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 8 Jan 2015 12:04:41 -0500 Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-116-64.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.64]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t08H4c4g031376 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Jan 2015 12:04:40 -0500 Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t08H4bF0022586; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 18:04:38 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t08H4Zho022585; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 18:04:35 +0100 Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 17:04:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Uros Bizjak Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , Martin Liska Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR ipa/64503 Message-ID: <20150108170435.GH1405@tucnak.redhat.com> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00395.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 01:43:59PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote: > Hello! > > >>>> There's suggested patch for PR ipa/64503 that was tested on x86_64 and it works. > >>>> I would like to ask Uros to test it on an aplha machine before we install the patch. > >>> > >>> Yes, this works for me on all IPA tests that were failing previously [1]. > >>> > >>> I am restarting the bootstrap + regtest, it will take ~10 hours, but I > >>> don't expect any surprises there. > >> > >> The patch was bootstrapped and regression tested on > >> alphaev68-linux-gnu [2] and everything was OK. > > > > Thanks for testing. May I take this as approval of the patch. > > I don't know, if you have a permission to accept my patch ;) > > Unfortunately, I have no approval power here. Luckilly, I know someone > who has ;) I don't know how portable scalbnl actually is in reality, so it would be nice to hear from port maintainers whether say newlib, android, darwin, cygwin, aix etc. have it. Jakub