public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] Fix REE for vector modes (PR rtl-optimization/64286)
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:02:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150112195943.GN1405@tucnak.redhat.com> (raw)

Hi!

As mentioned in the PR, giving up for all vector mode extensions
is unnecessary, but unlike scalar integer extensions, where the low part
of the extended value is the original value, for vectors this is not true,
thus the old value is lost.  Which means we can perform REE, but only if
all uses of the definition are the same (code+mode) extension.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2015-01-12  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR rtl-optimization/64286
	* ree.c (add_removable_extension): Don't add vector mode
	extensions if all uses of the source register aren't the same
	vector extensions.

	* gcc.target/i386/avx2-pr64286.c: New test.

--- gcc/ree.c.jj	2015-01-09 22:00:00.427660442 +0100
+++ gcc/ree.c	2015-01-12 12:15:56.097184674 +0100
@@ -1027,6 +1027,7 @@ add_removable_extension (const_rtx expr,
 	 different extension.  FIXME: this obviously can be improved.  */
       for (def = defs; def; def = def->next)
 	if ((idx = def_map[INSN_UID (DF_REF_INSN (def->ref))])
+	    && idx != -1U
 	    && (cand = &(*insn_list)[idx - 1])
 	    && cand->code != code)
 	  {
@@ -1038,6 +1039,57 @@ add_removable_extension (const_rtx expr,
 	      }
 	    return;
 	  }
+	/* For vector mode extensions, ensure that all uses of the
+	   XEXP (src, 0) register are the same extension (both code
+	   and to which mode), as unlike integral extensions lowpart
+	   subreg of the sign/zero extended register are not equal
+	   to the original register, so we have to change all uses or
+	   none.  */
+	else if (VECTOR_MODE_P (GET_MODE (XEXP (src, 0))))
+	  {
+	    if (idx == 0)
+	      {
+		struct df_link *ref_chain, *ref_link;
+
+		ref_chain = DF_REF_CHAIN (def->ref);
+		for (ref_link = ref_chain; ref_link; ref_link = ref_link->next)
+		  {
+		    if (ref_link->ref == NULL
+			|| DF_REF_INSN_INFO (ref_link->ref) == NULL)
+		      {
+			idx = -1U;
+			break;
+		      }
+		    rtx_insn *use_insn = DF_REF_INSN (ref_link->ref);
+		    const_rtx use_set;
+		    if (use_insn == insn || DEBUG_INSN_P (use_insn))
+		      continue;
+		    if (!(use_set = single_set (use_insn))
+			|| !REG_P (SET_DEST (use_set))
+			|| GET_MODE (SET_DEST (use_set)) != GET_MODE (dest)
+			|| GET_CODE (SET_SRC (use_set)) != code
+			|| !rtx_equal_p (XEXP (SET_SRC (use_set), 0),
+					 XEXP (src, 0)))
+		      {
+			idx = -1U;
+			break;
+		      }
+		  }
+		if (idx == -1U)
+		  def_map[INSN_UID (DF_REF_INSN (def->ref))] = idx;
+	      }
+	    if (idx == -1U)
+	      {
+		if (dump_file)
+		  {
+		    fprintf (dump_file, "Cannot eliminate extension:\n");
+		    print_rtl_single (dump_file, insn);
+		    fprintf (dump_file,
+			     " because some vector uses aren't extension\n");
+		  }
+		return;
+	      }
+	  }
 
       /* Then add the candidate to the list and insert the reaching definitions
          into the definition map.  */
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx2-pr64286.c.jj	2015-01-12 12:19:54.863031657 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx2-pr64286.c	2015-01-12 12:19:36.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+/* PR rtl-optimization/64286 */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -mavx2" } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target avx2 } */
+
+#include <string.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <x86intrin.h>
+#include "avx2-check.h"
+
+__m128i v;
+__m256i w;
+
+__attribute__((noinline, noclone)) void
+foo (__m128i *p, __m128i *q)
+{
+  __m128i a = _mm_loadu_si128 (p);
+  __m128i b = _mm_xor_si128 (a, v);
+  w = _mm256_cvtepu8_epi16 (a);
+  *q = b;
+}
+
+static void
+avx2_test (void)
+{
+  v = _mm_set1_epi8 (0x40);
+  __m128i c = _mm_set_epi8 (16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1);
+  __m128i d;
+  foo (&c, &d);
+  __m128i e = _mm_set_epi8 (0x50, 0x4f, 0x4e, 0x4d, 0x4c, 0x4b, 0x4a, 0x49,
+			    0x48, 0x47, 0x46, 0x45, 0x44, 0x43, 0x42, 0x41);
+  __m256i f = _mm256_set_epi16 (16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9,
+				8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1);
+  if (memcmp (&w, &f, sizeof (w)) != 0
+      || memcmp (&d, &e, sizeof (d)) != 0)
+    abort ();
+}

	Jakub

             reply	other threads:[~2015-01-12 19:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-12 20:02 Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2015-01-12 21:39 ` Jeff Law
2015-01-13 16:22   ` [PATCH] Fix REE for vector modes (PR rtl-optimization/64286, take 2) Jakub Jelinek
2015-01-13 19:24     ` Jeff Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150112195943.GN1405@tucnak.redhat.com \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=law@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).