public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
To: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>,
	       Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
Subject: [PATCH] Fix ICE in early inliner (PR ipa/65008)
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 10:56:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150219105303.GZ23138@redhat.com> (raw)

The problem exposed by this PR is (IIUC) that we hadn't gotten around to
recomputing the inline parameters in the case when optimize_inline_calls
introduces new statements.  That results in ICEing later on because in
estimate_edge_growth we assert that estimated size of a statement is not
0.

This happens since r220359 - with this change, we started to perform early
inlining even in always_inline functions.  So in the following testcase,
we have in A::A() at the start of early inlining:

  call_foo (this_2(D));

Since call_foo is always_inline, we inline it and apply the changes via
a call to optimize_inline_calls.  That turns the above statement into:

  A::foo (this_2(D));

This statement is new and we don't have the inline params for it computed,
because when estimate_function_body_sizes walked the IL, the stmt wasn't
there.

So fixed by doing what we do in early_inliner in a block below, that is,
recomputing the inline parameters.  I didn't copied the if that calls
gimple_check_call_matching_types and sets edge->call_stmt_cannot_inline_p,
I'm not sure if it's needed.

Does that make sense?

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux.

2015-02-19  Marek Polacek  <polacek@redhat.com>

	PR ipa/65008
	* ipa-inline.c (early_inliner): Recompute inline parameters.

	* g++.dg/ipa/pr65008.C: New test.

diff --git gcc/ipa-inline.c gcc/ipa-inline.c
index 025f7fc..c445f0a 100644
--- gcc/ipa-inline.c
+++ gcc/ipa-inline.c
@@ -2559,6 +2559,19 @@ early_inliner (function *fun)
 	{
 	  timevar_push (TV_INTEGRATION);
 	  todo |= optimize_inline_calls (current_function_decl);
+	  /* optimize_inline_calls call above might have introduced new
+	     statements that don't have inline parameters computed.  */
+	  for (edge = node->callees; edge; edge = edge->next_callee)
+	    {
+	      if (inline_edge_summary_vec.length () > (unsigned) edge->uid)
+		{
+		  struct inline_edge_summary *es = inline_edge_summary (edge);
+		  es->call_stmt_size
+		    = estimate_num_insns (edge->call_stmt, &eni_size_weights);
+		  es->call_stmt_time
+		    = estimate_num_insns (edge->call_stmt, &eni_time_weights);
+		}
+	    }
 	  inline_update_overall_summary (node);
 	  inlined = false;
 	  timevar_pop (TV_INTEGRATION);
diff --git gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr65008.C gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr65008.C
index e69de29..29b3a2f 100644
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr65008.C
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr65008.C
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+// PR ipa/65008
+// { dg-do compile }
+// { dg-options "-O2" }
+
+struct A
+{
+  A ();
+  virtual void foo () {}
+};
+
+static inline int __attribute__ ((always_inline)) call_foo (A *a)
+{
+  a->foo ();
+}
+
+A::A ()
+{
+  call_foo (this);
+}

	Marek

             reply	other threads:[~2015-02-19 10:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-19 10:56 Marek Polacek [this message]
2015-02-19 11:07 ` Richard Biener
2015-02-19 20:04   ` Marek Polacek
2015-02-26 14:20     ` Marek Polacek
2015-02-26 18:21       ` Jan Hubicka
2015-02-26 18:25       ` Jan Hubicka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150219105303.GZ23138@redhat.com \
    --to=polacek@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hubicka@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).