From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-394502-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 39718 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2015 04:47:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 39705 invoked by uid 89); 2 Apr 2015 04:47:44 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz
Received: from nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz (HELO nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.20.16) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 04:47:43 +0000
Received: by nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix, from userid 16202)	id 8E94654751C; Thu,  2 Apr 2015 06:47:38 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 04:47:00 -0000
From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Inliner badness metric tweak
Message-ID: <20150402044738.GA84683@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
References: <20150330014542.GC10552@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <CAMe9rOqXXvfUw9=PxA=rQv-z0PjjMoMu6jtm2N_dHA5P8z15+A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOqXXvfUw9=PxA=rQv-z0PjjMoMu6jtm2N_dHA5P8z15+A@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00042.txt.bz2

> 
> This caused:
> 
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65654

I will look into it; the assert checks that the expected function growth
match the real growth after inlining, so it is a semi-latent bug hit by this
patch.

Honza
> 
> -- 
> H.J.