From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 36609 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2015 19:59:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 36590 invoked by uid 89); 7 Apr 2015 19:59:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: troutmask.apl.washington.edu Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (HELO troutmask.apl.washington.edu) (128.95.76.21) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 07 Apr 2015 19:59:24 +0000 Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t37JxLlg017443 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 7 Apr 2015 12:59:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t37JxKl6017442; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 12:59:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 19:59:00 -0000 From: Steve Kargl To: Jerry DeLisle Cc: Dominique Dhumieres , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, fortran@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fortran/65429 -- don't dereference a null pointer Message-ID: <20150407195920.GA17421@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20150328000157.70A50105@mailhost.lps.ens.fr> <20150329162546.GA95666@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <551AD69A.9070309@charter.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <551AD69A.9070309@charter.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00276.txt.bz2 On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:17:14AM -0700, Jerry DeLisle wrote: > On 03/29/2015 09:25 AM, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 01:01:57AM +0100, Dominique Dhumieres wrote: > >> > >> AFAICT your test succeeds without your patch and does not test that the ICE > >> reported by FX is gone (indeed it is with your patch). > >> > > > > New patch and testcase. The ChangeLog entries are in the > > original email. Built and tested on x86_64-*-freebsd. > > OK, now? > > > > OK Steve. I just checked and this is not a regression with respect to 4.6, 4.7. 4.8, or 4.9. As 5.0 is coming soon, I'll for stage 1 to commit. -- Steve