From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-394838-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 44308 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2015 11:16:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 44206 invoked by uid 89); 9 Apr 2015 11:16:22 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 11:16:21 +0000
Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t39BGGhE000354	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL);	Thu, 9 Apr 2015 07:16:16 -0400
Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-116-58.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.58])	by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t39BGEF9022693	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);	Thu, 9 Apr 2015 07:16:16 -0400
Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t39BGDc1012995;	Thu, 9 Apr 2015 13:16:13 +0200
Received: (from jakub@localhost)	by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t39BGAN1012994;	Thu, 9 Apr 2015 13:16:10 +0200
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 11:16:00 -0000
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Yvan Roux <yvan.roux@linaro.org>
Cc: Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>, Terry Guo <terry.guo@arm.com>,        gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: patch to fix PR65648
Message-ID: <20150409111610.GE19273@tucnak.redhat.com>
Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
References: <5523F167.3010606@redhat.com> <20150407155143.GK19273@tucnak.redhat.com> <CAD57uCcf_5zj=_P_ASkF34ZMVBusVbN7bEz_9aP-ir3qx7Ocdg@mail.gmail.com> <20150407193339.GN19273@tucnak.redhat.com> <CAD57uCeGZJpxUTUm3BP38mStFNs0q2Fyn-rpGtSBVYsftHB3yQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD57uCcwLCJttGUoLDJcfJF16di+w5F9Hp2B78fywnpaMD32UQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAD57uCcwLCJttGUoLDJcfJF16di+w5F9Hp2B78fywnpaMD32UQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00378.txt.bz2

On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 01:10:41PM +0200, Yvan Roux wrote:
> 2105-04-09  Yvan Roux  <yvan.roux@linaro.org>
> 
>         PR target/65648
>         * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr65648.c: New test.

This part is definitely ok for trunk.

>         * gcc.target/arm/pr65648.c: New test.

This part should better be reviewed by some ARM maintainer, I'm really lost
in all the incompatible ARM options.

	Jakub