public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Prevent insane indirect call speculation
@ 2015-04-13  6:49 Jan Hubicka
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jan Hubicka @ 2015-04-13  6:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches


Hi,
this is simple change I made when i was debugging the Firefox wrong code.
I suspected we made a bogus devirtualization to function with wrong parameter
count.  Obviously we have nothing to prevent this from happening, so it is
better to check it.

Honza

	* ipa-profie.c (ipa_profile): Check number of parameters
	and possible polymorphic call targets before
	devirtualizing.
Index: ipa-profile.c
===================================================================
--- ipa-profile.c	(revision 222037)
+++ ipa-profile.c	(working copy)
@@ -524,6 +524,7 @@ ipa_profile (void)
   gcov_type overall_time = 0, cutoff = 0, cumulated = 0, overall_size = 0;
   struct cgraph_node *n,*n2;
   int nindirect = 0, ncommon = 0, nunknown = 0, nuseless = 0, nconverted = 0;
+  int nmismatch = 0, nimpossible = 0;
   bool node_map_initialized = false;
 
   if (dump_file)
@@ -651,6 +652,31 @@ ipa_profile (void)
 				 "Not speculating: target is overwritable "
 				 "and can be discarded.\n");
 		    }
+		  else if (ipa_node_params_sum && ipa_edge_args_vector
+			   && !IPA_NODE_REF (n2)->descriptors.is_empty ()
+			   && ipa_get_param_count (IPA_NODE_REF (n2))
+			      != ipa_get_cs_argument_count (IPA_EDGE_REF (e))
+			    && (ipa_get_param_count (IPA_NODE_REF (n2))
+				>= ipa_get_cs_argument_count (IPA_EDGE_REF (e))
+				|| !stdarg_p (TREE_TYPE (n2->decl))))
+		    {
+		      nmismatch++;
+		      if (dump_file)
+			fprintf (dump_file,
+				 "Not speculating: "
+				 "parameter count mistmatch\n");
+		    }
+		  else if (e->indirect_info->polymorphic
+			   && !opt_for_fn (n->decl, flag_devirtualize)
+			   && !possible_polymorphic_call_target_p (e, n2))
+		    {
+		      nimpossible++;
+		      if (dump_file)
+			fprintf (dump_file,
+				 "Not speculating: "
+				 "function is not in the polymorphic "
+				 "call target list\n");
+		    }
 		  else
 		    {
 		      /* Target may be overwritable, but profile says that
@@ -693,11 +719,15 @@ ipa_profile (void)
 	     "%i indirect calls trained.\n"
 	     "%i (%3.2f%%) have common target.\n"
 	     "%i (%3.2f%%) targets was not found.\n"
+	     "%i (%3.2f%%) targets had parameter count mismatch.\n"
+	     "%i (%3.2f%%) targets was not in polymorphic call target list.\n"
 	     "%i (%3.2f%%) speculations seems useless.\n"
 	     "%i (%3.2f%%) speculations produced.\n",
 	     nindirect,
 	     ncommon, ncommon * 100.0 / nindirect,
 	     nunknown, nunknown * 100.0 / nindirect,
+	     nmismatch, nmismatch * 100.0 / nindirect,
+	     nimpossible, nimpossible * 100.0 / nindirect,
 	     nuseless, nuseless * 100.0 / nindirect,
 	     nconverted, nconverted * 100.0 / nindirect);
 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2015-04-13  6:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-04-13  6:49 Prevent insane indirect call speculation Jan Hubicka

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).