From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 129199 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2015 09:10:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 129190 invoked by uid 89); 13 Apr 2015 09:10:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:10:04 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F16428E780; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:10:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-116-24.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.24]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3D9A1mT017923 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 13 Apr 2015 05:10:02 -0400 Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t3D9A0AH007795; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 11:10:00 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t3D99xiB007794; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 11:09:59 +0200 Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:10:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Richard Biener Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [PATCH] Bump DATESTAMP even on gcc-5-branch Message-ID: <20150413090959.GJ1735@tucnak.redhat.com> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00559.txt.bz2 Hi! I've noticed there was no DATESTAMP bump this morning on gcc-5-branch, hopefully fixed thusly. 2015-04-13 Jakub Jelinek * update_version_svn: Update DATESTAMP also on branches/gcc-[0-9]+-branch. --- update_version_svn (revision 221957) +++ update_version_svn (working copy) @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ SVN=${SVN:-/usr/bin/svn} # Compute the branches which we should update. BRANCHES=`$SVN ls $SVNROOT/branches \ | sed -e 's/\///' \ - | egrep 'gcc-[0-9]+_[0-9]+-branch$' \ + | egrep 'gcc-[0-9]+(_[0-9]+)?-branch$' \ | egrep -v $IGNORE_BRANCHES` # Always update the mainline. BRANCHES="${BRANCHES} ${ADD_BRANCHES}" Jakub