From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-395745-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8580 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2015 11:12:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8563 invoked by uid 89); 22 Apr 2015 11:12:10 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:12:09 +0000
Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24])	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D1C93C214;	Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:12:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-204-27.brq.redhat.com [10.40.204.27])	by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3MBC3CI000597	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);	Wed, 22 Apr 2015 07:12:06 -0400
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:12:00 -0000
From: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
To: Manuel =?iso-8859-1?B?TPNwZXotSWLh8WV6?= <lopezibanez@gmail.com>
Cc: Gcc Patch List <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [C/C++ PATCH] Improve -Wlogical-op (PR c/63357)
Message-ID: <20150422111203.GF28950@redhat.com>
References: <20150421111638.GB28950@redhat.com> <55365C6E.1080100@gmail.com> <20150422085924.GE28950@redhat.com> <CAESRpQBZbcDyHvdwRYm3AezZZoJLOiHP9JYAK5Tif-nQFZPSYw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAESRpQBZbcDyHvdwRYm3AezZZoJLOiHP9JYAK5Tif-nQFZPSYw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg01285.txt.bz2

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:50:17AM +0200, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> So, I think your proposal is an improvement, however, it does not
> fully fix the problem. For that, we need to have locations for the
> operands of expressions (PR43486), so we can check if they are also
> come from macro expansion.

Right.  Argh.  I'll post that input.h bit nonetheless, it certainly won't make
things worse...  Thanks.

	Marek