Hi all,

sorry, I forgot to svn-add the testcases for the patch of pr60322. I fixed this
with commit r222478.

My apologies for the oversight.

Regards,
	Andre

On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 13:34:16 +0200
Andre Vehreschild <vehre@gmx.de> wrote:

> Hi Paul, hi all,
> 
> Paul, thanks for the review. I have commited this as r222361.
> 
> Regards,
> 	Andre
> 
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 21:13:31 +0200
> Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Andre,
> > 
> > The delta patch is OK for trunk and eventual backport to 5.2.
> > 
> > Thanks for all the hard work
> > 
> > Paul
> > 
> > On 14 April 2015 at 19:00, Andre Vehreschild <vehre@gmx.de> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > during further testing of a big Fortran software I encounter two bugs with
> > > class arrays, that are somehow connected to pr60322. I therefore propose
> > > an extended patch for pr60322. Because Paul has already reviewed most the
> > > extended patch, I give you two patches:
> > >
> > > 1. a full patch, fixing all the issues connected to pr60322, and
> > > 2. a delta patch to get from the reviewed patch to the latest version.
> > >
> > > With the second patch I hope to get a faster review, because it is
> > > significantly shorter.
> > >
> > > Now what was the issue? To be precise there were two issues:
> > >
> > > i. a pointer to a class array (CLASS_DATA(sym).attr.class_pointer == 1)
> > > was dereferenced, which lead to an ICE (the patch for this in the delta is
> > > chunk 5 in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor, and
> > >
> > > ii. (and this was a severe brain cracker) in chains of references
> > > consisting of more then one class-(array)-ref always the _vptr of the
> > > first symbol was taken and not the _vptr of the currently dereferenced
> > > class object. This occurred when fortran code similiar to this was
> > > executed:
> > >
> > > type innerT
> > >   integer, allocatable :: arr(:)
> > > end type
> > >
> > > type T
> > >   class(innerT) :: mat(:,:)
> > > end type
> > >
> > > class(T) :: o
> > >
> > > allocate(o%mat(2,2))
> > > allocate(o%mat(:,:)%arr(10)) ! This is obviously pseudo code,
> > >         ! but I think you get what is meant.
> > >
> > > o%mat(1,1)%arr(1) = 1
> > >
> > > In the last line the address to get to arr(1) was computed using the
> > > _vptr->size of o and not of o%mat(1,1). To fix this gfc_component_ref ()
> > > now computes the class' _vptr-ref whenever it does a _data-ref (chunk 1 of
> > > trans-expr.c in the delta patch). The _vptr-ref is stored in gfc_se,
> > > where I added the new member class_vptr. The gfc_se->class_vptr is then
> > > used in array-refs (chunk 2 of trans.c) to get the size of the array
> > > elements of the correct level.
> > >
> > > The other chunks of the delta patch are:
> > > - parameter passing fixes, and
> > > - documentation fixes as requested for the version 5 of the pr60322 patch.
> > >
> > > I hope this helps in getting the patch reviewed quickly.
> > >
> > > Bootstraps and regtests ok on x86_64-linux-gnu/F21.
> > >
> > > Ok for trunk -> 6.0?
> > > Ok, for backport to 5.2, once available?
> > >
> > > Note, the patches may apply with shifts, as I forgot to update before
> > > taking the diffs.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >         Andre
> > >
> > > On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 14:37:09 +0200
> > > Andre Vehreschild <vehre@gmx.de> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Paul, hi all,
> > >>
> > >> Paul, thanks for the review. Answers to your questions are inline below:
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, 5 Apr 2015 11:13:05 +0200
> > >> Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> <snip>
> > >> > +  /* The dummy is returned for pointer, allocatable or assumed rank
> > >> > arrays.
> > >> > +     The check for pointerness needs to be repeated here (it is done
> > >> > in
> > >> > +     IS_CLASS_ARRAY (), too), because for class arrays that are
> > >> > pointers, as
> > >> > +     is the one of the sym, which is incorrect here.  */
> > >> >
> > >> > What does this mean, please?
> > >>
> > >> The first sentence is about regular arrays and should be unchanged from
> > >> the original source. Then I have to check for class (arrays) that are
> > >> pointers, i.e., independent of whether the sym is a class array or a
> > >> regular pointer to a class object. (The latter shouldn't make it into
> > >> the routine anyway.) IS_CLASS_ARRAY () returns false for too many
> > >> reasons to be of use here. I have to apologize and confess that the
> > >> comment was a mere note to myself to not return to use is_classarray in
> > >> the if below. Let me rephrase the comment to be:
> > >>
> > >> /* The dummy is returned for pointer, allocatable or assumed rank arrays.
> > >>    For class arrays the information if sym is an allocatable or pointer
> > >>    object needs to be checked explicitly (IS_CLASS_ARRAY can be false for
> > >>    too many reasons to be of use here).  */
> > >>
> > >> > +      /* Returning the descriptor for dummy class arrays is hazardous,
> > >> > because
> > >> > +     some caller is expecting an expression to apply the component
> > >> > refs to.
> > >> > +     Therefore the descriptor is only created and stored in
> > >> > +     sym->backend_decl's GFC_DECL_SAVED_DESCRIPTOR.  The caller is
> > >> > then
> > >> > +     responsible to extract it from there, when the descriptor is
> > >> > +     desired.  */
> > >> > +      if (IS_CLASS_ARRAY (sym)
> > >> > +      && (!DECL_LANG_SPECIFIC (sym->backend_decl)
> > >> > +          || !GFC_DECL_SAVED_DESCRIPTOR (sym->backend_decl)))
> > >> > +    {
> > >> > +      decl = gfc_build_dummy_array_decl (sym, sym->backend_decl);
> > >> > +      /* Prevent the dummy from being detected as unused if it is
> > >> > copied. */
> > >> > +      if (sym->backend_decl != NULL && decl != sym->backend_decl)
> > >> > +        DECL_ARTIFICIAL (sym->backend_decl) = 1;
> > >> > +      sym->backend_decl = decl;
> > >> > +    }
> > >> >
> > >> > The comments, such as the above are often going well beyond column 72,
> > >> > into the 80's. I know that much of the existing code violates this
> > >> > style requirement but there is no need to do so if clarity is not
> > >> > reduced thereby.
> > >>
> > >> Er, the document at
> > >>
> > >> https://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html#C_Formatting
> > >>
> > >> says that line length is 80, or is there another convention, that I am
> > >> not aware of?
> > >>
> > >> > In trans-stmt.c s/standart/standard/
> > >>
> > >> Fixed.
> > >>
> > >> > Don't forget to put the PR numbers in the ChangeLogs.
> > >>
> > >> I won't anymore, already got told off :-)
> > >>
> > >> > For this submission, I would have appreciated some a description of
> > >> > what each chunk in the patch is doing, just because there is so much
> > >> > of it. I suppose that it was good for my imortal soul to sort it out
> > >> > for myself but it took a little while :-)
> > >>
> > >> I initially tried to split the submission in two parts to make it more
> > >> manageable. One part with the brain-dead substitutions of as and
> > >> array_attr and one with the new code. Albeit I failed to get the
> > >> brain-dead part right and made some mistakes there already, which Mikael
> > >> pointed out. I therefore went for the big submission.
> > >>
> > >> Now doing a description of what each "chunk" does is quite tedious. I
> > >> really would like to spend my time more productive. Would you be
> > >> satisfied, when I write a story about the patch, referring to some parts
> > >> more explicitly, like
> > >>
> > >> "Chunk 4 of file trans-stmt.c is the heart of the patch and does this and
> > >> that. The remaining chunks are more or less putting the data together."
> > >>
> > >> (This is not correct for this patch of course. Just an example.) More
> > >> elaborate of course, but just to give an idea.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks again. I will commit as soon as 5.2/6.0 commit window is open.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >>       Andre
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > Cheers and many thanks for the patch.
> > >> >
> > >> > Paul
> > >> >
> > >> > On 27 March 2015 at 13:48, Paul Richard Thomas
> > >> > <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > > Dear Andre,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I am in the UK as of last night. Before leaving, I bootstrapped and
> > >> > > regtested your patch and all was well. I must drive to Cambridge this
> > >> > > afternoon to see my mother and will try to get to it either this
> > >> > > evening or tomorrow morning. There is so much of it and it touches
> > >> > > many places; so I must give it a very careful looking over before
> > >> > > giving the green light. Bear with me please.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Great work though!
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Paul
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On 24 March 2015 at 18:06, Andre Vehreschild <vehre@gmx.de> wrote:
> > >> > >> Hi all,
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> I have worked on the comments Mikael gave me. I am now checking for
> > >> > >> class_pointer in the way he pointed out.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Furthermore did I *join the two parts* of the patch into this one,
> > >> > >> because keeping both in sync was no benefit but only tedious and did
> > >> > >> not prove to be reviewed faster.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Paul, Dominique: I have addressed the LOC issue that came up lately.
> > >> > >> Or rather the patch addressed it already. I feel like this is not
> > >> > >> tested very well, not the loc() call nor the sizeof() call as given
> > >> > >> in the 57305 second's download. Unfortunately, is that download not
> > >> > >> runable. I would love to see a test similar to that download, but
> > >> > >> couldn't come up with one, that satisfied me. Given that the patch's
> > >> > >> review will last some days, I still have enough time to come up with
> > >> > >> something beautiful which I will add then.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Bootstraps and regtests ok on x86_64-linux-gnu/F20.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Regards,
> > >> > >>         Andre
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:13:27 +0100
> > >> > >> Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>> Dear Andre,
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> Dominique pointed out to me that the 'loc' patch causes a ICE in
> > >> > >>> the testsuite. It seems that 'loc' should provide the address of
> > >> > >>> the class container in some places and the address of the data in
> > >> > >>> others. I will put my thinking cap on tonight :-)
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> Cheers
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> Paul
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> On 23 March 2015 at 13:43, Andre Vehreschild <vehre@gmx.de> wrote:
> > >> > >>> > Hi Mikael,
> > >> > >>> >
> > >> > >>> > thanks for looking at the patch. Please note, that Paul has sent
> > >> > >>> > an addendum to the patches for 60322, which I deliberately have
> > >> > >>> > attached.
> > >> > >>> >
> > >> > >>> >>  26/02/2015 18:17, Andre Vehreschild a écrit :
> > >> > >>> >> > This first patch is only preparatory and does not change any
> > >> > >>> >> > of the semantics of gfortran at all.
> > >> > >>> >> Sure?
> > >> > >>> >
> > >> > >>> > With the counterexample you found below, this of course is a
> > >> > >>> > wrong statement.
> > >> > >>> >
> > >> > >>> >> > diff --git a/gcc/fortran/expr.c b/gcc/fortran/expr.c
> > >> > >>> >> > index ab6f7a5..d28cf77 100644
> > >> > >>> >> > --- a/gcc/fortran/expr.c
> > >> > >>> >> > +++ b/gcc/fortran/expr.c
> > >> > >>> >> > @@ -4059,10 +4060,10 @@ gfc_lval_expr_from_sym (gfc_symbol
> > >> > >>> >> > *sym) lval->symtree = gfc_find_symtree (sym->ns->sym_root,
> > >> > >>> >> > sym->name);
> > >> > >>> >> >
> > >> > >>> >> >    /* It will always be a full array.  */
> > >> > >>> >> > -  lval->rank = sym->as ? sym->as->rank : 0;
> > >> > >>> >> > +  as = sym->as;
> > >> > >>> >> > +  lval->rank = as ? as->rank : 0;
> > >> > >>> >> >    if (lval->rank)
> > >> > >>> >> > -    gfc_add_full_array_ref (lval, sym->ts.type == BT_CLASS ?
> > >> > >>> >> > -                       CLASS_DATA (sym)->as : sym->as);
> > >> > >>> >> > +    gfc_add_full_array_ref (lval, as);
> > >> > >>> >>
> > >> > >>> >> This is a change of semantics.  Or do you know that
> > >> > >>> >> sym->ts.type != BT_CLASS?
> > >> > >>> >
> > >> > >>> > You are completely right. I have made a mistake here. I have to
> > >> > >>> > tell the truth, I never ran a regtest with only part 1 of the
> > >> > >>> > patches applied. The second part of the patch will correct this,
> > >> > >>> > by setting the variable as depending on whether type == BT_CLASS
> > >> > >>> > or not. Sorry for the mistake.
> > >> > >>> >
> > >> > >>> >> > diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
> > >> > >>> >> > b/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c index 3664824..e571a17 100644
> > >> > >>> >> > --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
> > >> > >>> >> > +++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
> > >> > >>> >> > @@ -1013,16 +1017,24 @@ gfc_build_dummy_array_decl
> > >> > >>> >> > (gfc_symbol * sym, tree dummy) tree decl;
> > >> > >>> >> >    tree type;
> > >> > >>> >> >    gfc_array_spec *as;
> > >> > >>> >> > +  symbol_attribute *array_attr;
> > >> > >>> >> >    char *name;
> > >> > >>> >> >    gfc_packed packed;
> > >> > >>> >> >    int n;
> > >> > >>> >> >    bool known_size;
> > >> > >>> >> >
> > >> > >>> >> > -  if (sym->attr.pointer || sym->attr.allocatable
> > >> > >>> >> > -      || (sym->as && sym->as->type == AS_ASSUMED_RANK))
> > >> > >>> >> > +  /* Use the array as and attr.  */
> > >> > >>> >> > +  as = sym->as;
> > >> > >>> >> > +  array_attr = &sym->attr;
> > >> > >>> >> > +
> > >> > >>> >> > +  /* The pointer attribute is always set on a _data
> > >> > >>> >> > component, therefore check
> > >> > >>> >> > +     the sym's attribute only.  */
> > >> > >>> >> > +  if (sym->attr.pointer || array_attr->allocatable
> > >> > >>> >> > +      || (as && as->type == AS_ASSUMED_RANK))
> > >> > >>> >> >      return dummy;
> > >> > >>> >> >
> > >> > >>> >> Any reason to sometimes use array_attr, sometimes not, like
> > >> > >>> >> here? By the way, the comment is misleading: for classes, there
> > >> > >>> >> is the class_pointer attribute (and it is a pain, I know).
> > >> > >>> >
> > >> > >>> > Yes, and a good one. Array_attr is sometimes sym->attr and
> > >> > >>> > sometimes CLASS_DATA(sym)->attr aka
> > >> > >>> > sym->ts.u.derived->components->attr. In the later case .pointer
> > >> > >>> > is always set to 1 in the _data component's attr. I.e., the
> > >> > >>> > above if, would always yield true for a class_array, which is
> > >> > >>> > not intended, but rather destructive. I know about the
> > >> > >>> > class_pointer attribute, but I figured, that it is not relevant
> > >> > >>> > here. Any idea how to formulate the comment better, to reflect
> > >> > >>> > what I just explained?
> > >> > >>> >
> > >> > >>> > Regards,
> > >> > >>> >         Andre
> > >> > >>> > --
> > >> > >>> > Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
> > >> > >>> >
> > >> > >>> >
> > >> > >>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > >> > >>> > From: Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com>
> > >> > >>> > To: Andre Vehreschild <vehre@gmx.de>, Dominique Dhumieres
> > >> > >>> > <dominiq@lps.ens.fr> Cc:
> > >> > >>> > Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 21:20:20 +0100
> > >> > >>> > Subject: Bug in intrinsic LOC for scalar class objects
> > >> > >>> > Dear Andre and Dominique,
> > >> > >>> >
> > >> > >>> > I have found that LOC is returning the address of the class
> > >> > >>> > container rather than the _data component for class scalars. See
> > >> > >>> > the source below, which you will recognise! A fix is attached.
> > >> > >>> >
> > >> > >>> > Note that the scalar allocate fails with MOLD= and so I
> > >> > >>> > substituted SOURCE=.
> > >> > >>> >
> > >> > >>> > Cheers
> > >> > >>> >
> > >> > >>> > Paul
> > >> > >>> >
> > >> > >>> >     class(*), allocatable :: a(:), e ! Change 'e' to an array and
> > >> > >>> > second memcpy works correctly
> > >> > >>> >                                      ! Problem is with loc(e),
> > >> > >>> > which returns the address of the
> > >> > >>> >                                      ! class container.
> > >> > >>> >     allocate (e, source = 99.0)
> > >> > >>> >     allocate (a(2), source = [1.0, 2.0])
> > >> > >>> >     call add_element_poly (a,e)
> > >> > >>> >     select type (a)
> > >> > >>> >       type is (real)
> > >> > >>> >         print *, a
> > >> > >>> >     end select
> > >> > >>> >
> > >> > >>> > contains
> > >> > >>> >
> > >> > >>> >     subroutine add_element_poly(a,e)
> > >> > >>> >       use iso_c_binding
> > >> > >>> >       class(*),allocatable,intent(inout),target :: a(:)
> > >> > >>> >       class(*),intent(in),target :: e
> > >> > >>> >       class(*),allocatable,target :: tmp(:)
> > >> > >>> >       type(c_ptr) :: dummy
> > >> > >>> >
> > >> > >>> >       interface
> > >> > >>> >         function memcpy(dest,src,n) bind(C,name="memcpy")
> > >> > >>> > result(res) import
> > >> > >>> >           type(c_ptr) :: res
> > >> > >>> >           integer(c_intptr_t),value :: dest
> > >> > >>> >           integer(c_intptr_t),value :: src
> > >> > >>> >           integer(c_size_t),value :: n
> > >> > >>> >         end function
> > >> > >>> >       end interface
> > >> > >>> >
> > >> > >>> >       if (.not.allocated(a)) then
> > >> > >>> >         allocate(a(1), source=e)
> > >> > >>> >       else
> > >> > >>> >         allocate(tmp(size(a)),source=a)
> > >> > >>> >         deallocate(a)
> > >> > >>> >         allocate(a(size(tmp)+1),source=e) ! mold gives a segfault
> > >> > >>> >         dummy = memcpy(loc(a(1)),loc(tmp),sizeof(tmp))
> > >> > >>> >         dummy = memcpy(loc(a(size(tmp)+1)),loc(e),sizeof(e))
> > >> > >>> >       end if
> > >> > >>> >     end subroutine
> > >> > >>> > end
> > >> > >>> >
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> --
> > >> > >> Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's
> > >> > > too dark to read.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Groucho Marx
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 


-- 
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de