From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-396592-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28571 invoked by alias); 1 May 2015 11:05:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27865 invoked by uid 89); 1 May 2015 11:05:32 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 01 May 2015 11:05:31 +0000
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t41B5Tix004344	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL);	Fri, 1 May 2015 07:05:29 -0400
Received: from localhost (ovpn-116-62.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.62])	by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t41B5Sle032755;	Fri, 1 May 2015 07:05:29 -0400
Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 11:05:00 -0000
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
To: Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd@verizon.net>
Cc: Daniel =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kr=FCgler?= <daniel.kruegler@gmail.com>,        gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,        "libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [libstdc++] Add uniform container erasure.
Message-ID: <20150501110528.GB3618@redhat.com>
References: <55421311.90905@verizon.net> <20150430123911.GS3618@redhat.com> <55423FD1.3090301@verizon.net> <CAGNvRgDW9504AWnPpDBvDMpHutHmNziJBbUaLeqkpNvEmmcDKw@mail.gmail.com> <55435D1F.3090800@verizon.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <55435D1F.3090800@verizon.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00030.txt.bz2

On 01/05/15 07:01 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
>On 04/30/2015 02:01 PM, Daniel Krügler wrote:
>>Shouldn't the "one-liner" forwarding function templates be declared 
>>as inline? - Daniel
>You are right.
>
>This builds and tests clean on x86_64-linux.
>
>OK?

Yes OK, thanks.