public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>
Cc: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>,
	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,        Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Expand PIC calls without PLT with -fno-plt
Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 15:46:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150506154554.GZ1751@tucnak.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.11.1505061730460.22867@monopod.intra.ispras.ru>

On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 06:24:58PM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> If the same PLT stubs as today are to be used, it constrains the compiler on
> 32-bit x86 and possibly other arches where PLT stubs need GOT pointer in a
> specific register.  It's possible to imagine more complex PLT stubs that
> obtain GOT pointer on their own, but in that case you can't let optimizations
> such as loop invariant motion move the GOT load away from the call in a
> fashion that could result in PLT stub pointer be reused many times.

Why?
32-bit x86 (shouldn't we care much more about x86-64, where this is a
non-issue?) PLT looks like:

4c2b7310 <_Unwind_Find_FDE@plt-0x10>:
4c2b7310:       ff b3 04 00 00 00       pushl  0x4(%ebx)
4c2b7316:       ff a3 08 00 00 00       jmp    *0x8(%ebx)
4c2b731c:       00 00                   add    %al,(%eax)
        ...

4c2b7320 <_Unwind_Find_FDE@plt>:
4c2b7320:       ff a3 0c 00 00 00       jmp    *0xc(%ebx)
4c2b7326:       68 00 00 00 00          push   $0x0
4c2b732b:       e9 e0 ff ff ff          jmp    4c2b7310

4c2b7330 <realloc@plt>:
4c2b7330:       ff a3 10 00 00 00       jmp    *0x10(%ebx)
4c2b7336:       68 08 00 00 00          push   $0x8
4c2b733b:       e9 d0 ff ff ff          jmp    4c2b7310

The linker would know very well what kind of relocations are used for
particular PLT slot, and for the new relocations which would resolve to the
address of the .got.plt slot it could just tweak corresponding 3rd insn
in the slot, to not jump to first plt slot - 16, but a few bytes before that
that would just load the address of _G_O_T_ into %ebx and then fallthru
into the 0x4c2b7310 snippet above.  The lazy binding would be a few ticks
slower in that case, but no requirement on %ebx to contain _G_O_T_.

As for hoisting the load of the call address before the loop, with lazy
binding that has the obvious disadvantage that you'd resolve the slot again
and again, if you are unlucky enough that the function hasn't been resolved
yet.  Unless the shared PLT stub after computing _G_O_T_ (for x86) also
rechecks the .got.plt address.

	Jakub

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-06 15:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 106+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-04 16:38 PIC calls without PLT, generic implementation Alexander Monakov
2015-05-04 16:38 ` [PATCH i386] Move CLOBBERED_REGS earlier in register class list Alexander Monakov
2015-05-10 16:44   ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-10 17:51     ` Uros Bizjak
2015-05-10 18:09       ` Uros Bizjak
2015-05-11 16:26         ` Alexander Monakov
2015-05-11 16:30           ` Uros Bizjak
2015-05-04 16:38 ` [PATCH i386] Extend sibcall peepholes to allow source in %eax Alexander Monakov
2015-05-10 16:54   ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-11 17:50     ` Alexander Monakov
2015-05-11 18:00       ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-11 19:46         ` Uros Bizjak
2015-05-11 19:48           ` Jeff Law
2015-05-11 20:16             ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-13 19:05               ` Alexander Monakov
2015-05-13 20:04                 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-14 17:36                   ` Alexander Monakov
2015-05-04 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH] ira: accept loads via argp rtx in validate_equiv_mem Alexander Monakov
2015-05-04 17:37   ` Jeff Law
2015-05-04 16:38 ` [PATCH i386] PR65753: allow PIC tail calls via function pointers Alexander Monakov
2015-05-10 16:37   ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-11 16:11     ` Alexander Monakov
2015-05-04 16:38 ` [PATCH i386] Allow sibcalls in no-PLT PIC Alexander Monakov
2015-05-15 16:37   ` Alexander Monakov
2015-05-15 16:48     ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-15 20:08       ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-15 20:23         ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-15 20:35           ` Rich Felker
2015-05-15 20:37             ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-15 20:45               ` Rich Felker
2015-05-15 22:16                 ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-15 23:14                   ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-15 23:30                     ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-15 23:35                       ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-15 23:44                         ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-16  0:18                           ` Rich Felker
2015-05-16 14:33                             ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-16 19:03                               ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-16 19:32                                 ` Rich Felker
2015-05-16 23:23                                   ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-15 23:49                       ` Rich Felker
2015-05-19 14:48                         ` Michael Matz
2015-05-19 15:11                           ` Jeff Law
2015-05-19 16:03                             ` Michael Matz
2015-05-19 19:11                               ` Rich Felker
2015-05-19 18:08                           ` Rich Felker
2015-05-19 19:03                             ` Richard Henderson
2015-05-19 19:10                               ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-19 19:17                                 ` Richard Henderson
2015-05-19 19:20                                   ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-19 19:54                                     ` Richard Henderson
2015-05-19 20:27                                     ` Rich Felker
2015-05-19 20:44                                       ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-19 21:28                                         ` Rich Felker
2015-05-20  0:52                                           ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-20  1:09                                             ` Rich Felker
2015-05-22 19:32                                               ` Richard Henderson
2015-05-19 19:48                               ` Rich Felker
2015-05-19 20:16                                 ` Richard Henderson
2015-05-20 12:13                               ` Michael Matz
2015-05-20 12:40                                 ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-20 14:17                                 ` Rich Felker
2015-05-20 14:33                                   ` Michael Matz
2015-05-18 18:25         ` Alexander Monakov
2015-05-18 19:03           ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-04 16:38 ` [PATCH] Expand PIC calls without PLT with -fno-plt Alexander Monakov
2015-05-04 17:34   ` Jeff Law
2015-05-04 17:40     ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-05-04 17:42       ` Jeff Law
2015-05-06  3:08         ` Rich Felker
2015-05-10 17:07           ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-06 15:25         ` Alexander Monakov
2015-05-06 15:46           ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2015-05-06 15:55             ` Jeff Law
2015-05-06 16:44             ` Alexander Monakov
2015-05-06 17:35               ` Rich Felker
2015-05-06 18:26                 ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-06 18:37                   ` Rich Felker
2015-05-06 18:45                     ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-06 19:01                       ` Rich Felker
2015-05-06 19:05                         ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-06 19:18                           ` Rich Felker
2015-05-06 19:24                             ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-11 11:48                             ` Michael Matz
2015-05-11 14:20                               ` Rich Felker
2015-05-07 18:22           ` Jeff Law
2015-05-07 19:13             ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-10 16:59   ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-11 20:36     ` Jeff Law
2015-05-11 20:55       ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-11 22:13         ` Jan Hubicka
2015-06-22 15:52   ` Jiong Wang
2015-06-22 18:18     ` Alexander Monakov
2015-06-23  8:41       ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2015-06-23 10:43         ` Alexander Monakov
2015-06-23 13:28         ` Jeff Law
2015-07-16 10:37           ` [AArch64] Tighten direct call pattern to repair -fno-plt Jiong Wang
2015-07-16 10:47             ` Alexander Monakov
2015-07-16 10:48               ` Jiong Wang
2015-07-21 12:52                 ` [AArch64][sibcall]Tighten " Jiong Wang
2015-08-04  9:50                   ` James Greenhalgh
2015-08-06 16:18                     ` [COMMITTED][AArch64][sibcall]Tighten " Jiong Wang
2015-08-07  8:22                       ` James Greenhalgh
2015-08-07 13:28                         ` Jiong Wang
2015-08-04  9:50             ` [AArch64] Tighten " James Greenhalgh
2015-08-06 16:16               ` [COMMITTED][AArch64] " Jiong Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150506154554.GZ1751@tucnak.redhat.com \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=amonakov@ispras.ru \
    --cc=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=law@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).