From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
To: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: False ODR violation positives on anonymous namespace types
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 14:13:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150512140313.GA26537@kam.mff.cuni.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55520517.1020507@redhat.com>
> On 05/11/2015 04:39 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >What happens in LTO is that lto-symtab decide to merge the two declarations of
> >foo. At this time it has chance to output the warning. For that it needs to
> >be able to work out that these declarations are having different types, but
> >because LTO merge canonical types on structural basis, types_compatible_p
> >(long, int) will return true.
>
> OK. So I guess it makes sense to check built-in integer types as
> well, but compound types should be compared structurally.
Yes, agreed.
if (flag_lto_odr_type_mering
&& TREE_CODE (decl) == TYPE_DECL
&& DECL_NAME (decl)
&& decl == TYPE_NAME (TREE_TYPE (decl))
&& !is_lang_specific (TREE_TYPE (decl))
/* Save some work. Names of builtin types are always derived from
properties of its main variant. A special case are integer types
where mangling do make differences between char/signed char/unsigned
char etc. Storing name for these makes e.g.
-fno-signed-char/-fsigned-char mismatches to be handled well.
See cp/mangle.c:write_builtin_type for details. */
&& (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (decl)) != VOID_TYPE
&& TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (decl)) != BOOLEAN_TYPE
&& TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (decl)) != REAL_TYPE
&& TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (decl)) != FIXED_POINT_TYPE)
&& !TYPE_ARTIFICIAL (TREE_TYPE (decl))
&& !variably_modified_type_p (TREE_TYPE (decl), NULL_TREE)
&& !type_in_anonymous_namespace_p (TREE_TYPE (decl)))
I probably want to check
/* Record, union and enumeration type have linkage that allows use
to check type_in_anonymous_namespace_p. Compound types
can be always compared structurally.
To save some work we compare builtin types properties of its main
variant. A special case are integer types where mangling do make
differences between char/signed char/unsigned char etc. Storing name
for these makes e.g. -fno-signed-char/-fsigned-char mismatches to be
handled well.
See cp/mangle.c:write_builtin_type for details. */
&& ((RECORD_OR_UNION_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (decl))
|| TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (decl)) == ENUMERATION_TIME
&& !type_in_anonymous_namespace_p (TREE_TYPE (decl)))
|| TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (decl)) == INTEGER_TYPE)
I will test this. Thank you!
Honza
>
> Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-12 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-11 14:28 Jan Hubicka
2015-05-11 17:16 ` Jason Merrill
2015-05-11 17:46 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-11 17:54 ` Jason Merrill
2015-05-11 18:05 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-11 21:21 ` Jason Merrill
2015-05-11 21:52 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-12 13:51 ` Jason Merrill
2015-05-12 14:13 ` Jan Hubicka [this message]
2015-05-12 14:54 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-12 16:07 ` Jason Merrill
2015-05-12 16:27 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-12 18:40 ` Jan Hubicka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150512140313.GA26537@kam.mff.cuni.cz \
--to=hubicka@ucw.cz \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jason@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).