Re: Fix two more memory leaks in threader

[Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>]

On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:36:25AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> 
> These fix the remaining leaks in the threader that I'm aware of.  We failed
> to properly clean-up when we had to cancel certain jump threading
> opportunities.  So thankfully this wasn't a big leak.
> 
> Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Installed on
> the trunk.
> 
> Jeff

> diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
> index fe4dfc4..27435c6 100644
> --- a/gcc/ChangeLog
> +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
> @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
> +2015-05-20  Jeff Law  <law@redhat.com>
> +
> +	* tree-ssa-threadupdate.c (mark_threaded_blocks): Properly
> +	dispose of the jump thread path when the jump threading
> +	opportunity is cancelled.
> +
>  2015-05-20  Manuel López-Ibáñez  <manu@gcc.gnu.org>
>  
>  	* diagnostic.c (diagnostic_print_caret_line): Fix off-by-one error
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-threadupdate.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-threadupdate.c
> index c5b78a4..4bccad0 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-threadupdate.c
> +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-threadupdate.c
> @@ -2159,9 +2159,16 @@ mark_threaded_blocks (bitmap threaded_blocks)
>          {
>  	  /* Attach the path to the starting edge if none is yet recorded.  */
>            if ((*path)[0]->e->aux == NULL)
> -            (*path)[0]->e->aux = path;
> -	  else if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
> -	    dump_jump_thread_path (dump_file, *path, false);
> +	    {
> +              (*path)[0]->e->aux = path;
> +	    }

Why the braces around single stmt if body?
Also, the indentation seems to be weird.

	Jakub