public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
To: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
Cc: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
	Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>,
	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, rguenther@suse.de
Subject: Re: Teach gimple_canonical_types_compatible_p about incomplete types
Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 03:28:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150529225626.GA24506@kam.mff.cuni.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150529211758.GA51555@kam.mff.cuni.cz>

Joseph, Richard,
this is patch implementing the ENUM/INGEGER globbing and also POINTER/REFERENCE
(though I don't know if that one follows by some standard rules).
Joseph, does the attached testcase make sense for you? Is it defined? It is my
first attempt to really interpret C standard to detail.

Ideally I would like to have testcases for all the globbing we do and reasoning
why it is needed.

Bootstraped/regtested ppc64le-linux. OK?

Honza

	* lto.c (hash_canonical_type): Use tree_code_for_canonical_type_merging.

	* tree.h (tree_code_for_canonical_type_merging): New function.
	* tree.c (gimple_canonical_types_compatible_p): Use
	tree_code_for_canonical_type_merging..
	* gcc.dg/lto/c-compatible-types_0.c: New testcase.
	* gcc.dg/lto/c-compatible-types_1.c: New testcase.
Index: lto/lto.c
===================================================================
--- lto/lto.c	(revision 223877)
+++ lto/lto.c	(working copy)
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@
      smaller sets; when searching for existing matching types to merge,
      only existing types having the same features as the new type will be
      checked.  */
-  hstate.add_int (TREE_CODE (type));
+  hstate.add_int (tree_code_for_canonical_type_merging (TREE_CODE (type)));
   hstate.add_int (TYPE_MODE (type));
 
   /* Incorporate common features of numerical types.  */
Index: testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/c-compatible-types_0.c
===================================================================
--- testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/c-compatible-types_0.c	(revision 0)
+++ testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/c-compatible-types_0.c	(working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3" } */
+/* By C standard Each enumerated type shall be compatible with char, a  signed
+   integer, type, or an unsigned integer type. The choice of type is
+   implementation-defined.  Check that enum and unsigned int match.  */
+unsigned int a;
+unsigned int *b;
+void t();
+
+void reset ()
+{
+  asm("":"=r"(a):"0"(0));
+}
+int
+main()
+{
+  asm("":"=r"(a):"0"(1));
+  asm("":"=r"(b):"0"(&a));
+  t();
+  return 0;
+}
Index: testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/c-compatible-types_1.c
===================================================================
--- testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/c-compatible-types_1.c	(revision 0)
+++ testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/c-compatible-types_1.c	(working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+enum a {test1, test2};
+enum a a;
+enum a *b;
+
+void reset (void);
+
+void
+t()
+{
+  if (a != test2)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+  if (*b != test2)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+  reset ();
+  if (a != test1)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+  if (*b != test1)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+}
Index: tree.c
===================================================================
--- tree.c	(revision 223877)
+++ tree.c	(working copy)
@@ -12877,7 +12877,8 @@
     return TYPE_CANONICAL (t1) == TYPE_CANONICAL (t2);
 
   /* Can't be the same type if the types don't have the same code.  */
-  if (TREE_CODE (t1) != TREE_CODE (t2))
+  if (tree_code_for_canonical_type_merging (TREE_CODE (t1))
+      != tree_code_for_canonical_type_merging (TREE_CODE (t2)))
     return false;
 
   /* Qualifiers do not matter for canonical type comparison purposes.  */
Index: tree.h
===================================================================
--- tree.h	(revision 223877)
+++ tree.h	(working copy)
@@ -4598,7 +4598,28 @@
 extern void DEBUG_FUNCTION verify_type (const_tree t);
 extern bool gimple_canonical_types_compatible_p (const_tree, const_tree,
 						 bool trust_type_canonical = true);
+/* Return simplified tree code of type that is used for canonical type merging.  */
+inline enum tree_code
+tree_code_for_canonical_type_merging (enum tree_code code)
+{
+  /* By C standard, each enumerated type shall be compatible with char,
+     a signed integer, or an unsigned integer.  The choice of type is
+     implementation defined (in our case it depends on -fshort-enum).
 
+     For this reason we make no distinction between ENUMERAL_TYPE and INTEGER
+     type and compare only by their signedness and precision.  */
+  if (code == ENUMERAL_TYPE)
+    return INTEGER_TYPE;
+  /* To allow inter-operability between languages having references and
+     C, we consider reference types and pointers alike.  Note that this is
+     not strictly necessary for C-Fortran 2008 interoperability because
+     Fortran define C_PTR type that needs to be compatible with C pointers
+     and we handle this one as ptr_type_node.  */
+  if (code == REFERENCE_TYPE)
+    return POINTER_TYPE;
+  return code;
+}
+
 #define tree_map_eq tree_map_base_eq
 extern unsigned int tree_map_hash (const void *);
 #define tree_map_marked_p tree_map_base_marked_p

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-29 22:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-25  1:32 Jan Hubicka
2015-05-25 17:33 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2015-05-26  1:18   ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-29 21:37     ` Joseph Myers
2015-05-29 21:46       ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-30  3:28         ` Jan Hubicka [this message]
2015-05-30 15:38           ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2015-05-30 21:14             ` Jan Hubicka
2015-06-01 19:47           ` Joseph Myers
2015-06-02 17:34             ` Jan Hubicka
2015-06-02 17:43               ` Joseph Myers
2015-06-02 17:55                 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-06-03 11:41           ` Richard Biener
2015-06-03 22:12             ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-26  8:45 ` Richard Biener
2015-05-26 17:36   ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-27  8:38     ` Richard Biener
2015-05-27 22:53       ` Jan Hubicka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150529225626.GA24506@kam.mff.cuni.cz \
    --to=hubicka@ucw.cz \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=rep.dot.nop@gmail.com \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).