From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 119372 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2015 09:04:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 119339 invoked by uid 89); 3 Jun 2015 09:04:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtp.eu.adacore.com Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO smtp.eu.adacore.com) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 09:04:01 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32EE2852F2A; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 11:03:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.eu.adacore.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lnr8FW1hvmKW; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 11:03:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from chelles.act-europe.fr (chelles.act-europe.fr [10.10.0.160]) by smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE41D2852F28; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 11:03:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: by chelles.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 525) id B01691EAC901; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 11:03:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 09:14:00 -0000 From: Arnaud Charlet To: John Marino Cc: Eric Botcazou , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Thomas Quinot Subject: Re: [patch] Implement Ada support for DragonFly, improve it for FreeBSD Message-ID: <20150603090358.GB28561@adacore.com> References: <5568E37B.3050401@marino.st> <20777268.lEEs1vboLO@polaris> <20150603073036.GA10341@adacore.com> <556EB67B.5010704@marino.st> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <556EB67B.5010704@marino.st> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg00284.txt.bz2 > Okay, so that means the Makefile.in patch needs changing in two ways: > 1. Don't remove TOOL_TARGET_PAIRS lines from two FreeBSD targets > 2. Add TOOL_TARGET_PAIRS line to new DragonFly target. Right. > Is a new submission necessary or can this be handled by committer? Preferably yes. > A new submission will take me a few days because I'm traveling ATM. No problem. > In all likelihood, I would be the first to discover the breakage and > also the most likely to submit the patch. This covers all three targets > (both FreeBSD and the one DragonFly). OK, as long as this happens and the files do not bitrot, that's fine with me. What I want to avoid is a one time submit and no follow ups afterwards, and files which no longer work after some time, with nobody bothering fixing them. Arno