From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix ix86_split_long_move collision handling with TLS (PR target/66470)
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 13:44:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150609133905.GB10247@tucnak.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFULd4Zv0yo6tRWE8WvW9OqAs8U-kf=woHnAWLWwB9KBBDzoAA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 03:21:55PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> I'm afraid that simple scan loop won't work correctly on x32. There
> are some issues with UNSPEC_TP for this target, so we have to generate
> zero_extend of SImode UNSPEC, e.g.:
>
> (plus:DI (zero_extend:DI (unspec:SI [...] UNSPEC_TP) (reg:DI ...))
>
> as can be seen in get_thread_pointer to construct the address. It
> looks that your loop won't find the UNSPEC_TP tag in the above case.
You're right, for -m32 it would need to start with
rtx *x = &addr;
+ while (GET_CODE (*x) == ZERO_EXTEND
+ || GET_CODE (*x) == AND
+ || GET_CODE (*x) == SUBREG)
+ x = &XEXP (*x, 0);
to get at the PLUS. Now, with either the original patch with the above
ammendment, or with the iterators, the question is what to do
with the UNSPEC_TP for -m32. Is it ok to just use addr32 on the
lea and use normal Pmode (== DImode) addressing for the memory reads
(if I read the code well, that is what it does right now for the non-TLS
ones:
if (GET_MODE (base) != Pmode)
base = gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, REGNO (base));
)? Then we'd need to change tls_base mode to Pmode.
Jakub
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-09 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-09 12:05 Jakub Jelinek
2015-06-09 12:32 ` Uros Bizjak
2015-06-09 12:57 ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-06-09 13:26 ` Uros Bizjak
2015-06-09 13:44 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2015-06-09 14:06 ` Uros Bizjak
2015-06-09 14:21 ` Uros Bizjak
2015-06-09 14:44 ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-06-09 16:19 ` Uros Bizjak
2015-06-09 16:57 ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-06-09 19:17 ` Uros Bizjak
2015-06-09 20:11 ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-06-10 6:38 ` Uros Bizjak
2015-06-10 6:43 ` Richard Sandiford
2015-06-10 7:07 ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-06-10 7:13 ` Uros Bizjak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150609133905.GB10247@tucnak.redhat.com \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).