From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] PR target/66819: Allow indirect sibcall with register arguments
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:54:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150709105439.GA19247@gmail.com> (raw)
Indirect sibcall with register arguments is OK when there is register
available for argument passing.
OK for trunk if there is no regression?
H.J.
---
gcc/
PR target/66819
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_function_ok_for_sibcall): Allow
indirect sibcall with register arguments if register available
for argument passing.
(init_cumulative_args): Set cfun->machine->arg_reg_available_p
to cum->nregs != 0.
(function_arg_advance_32): Set cfun->machine->arg_reg_available_p
to 0 when setting cum->nregs = 0.
* config/i386/i386.h (machine_function): Add arg_reg_available_p.
gcc/testsuite/
PR target/66819
* gcc.target/i386/pr66819-1.c: New test.
* gcc.target/i386/pr66819-2.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr66819-3.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr66819-4.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr66819-5.c: Likewise.
---
gcc/config/i386/i386.c | 15 +++++++++------
gcc/config/i386/i386.h | 3 +++
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr66819-1.c | 8 ++++++++
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr66819-2.c | 8 ++++++++
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr66819-3.c | 10 ++++++++++
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr66819-4.c | 12 ++++++++++++
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr66819-5.c | 10 ++++++++++
7 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr66819-1.c
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr66819-2.c
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr66819-3.c
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr66819-4.c
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr66819-5.c
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index 54ee6f3..85e59a8 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -5628,12 +5628,12 @@ ix86_function_ok_for_sibcall (tree decl, tree exp)
if (!decl
|| (TARGET_DLLIMPORT_DECL_ATTRIBUTES && DECL_DLLIMPORT_P (decl)))
{
- if (ix86_function_regparm (type, NULL) >= 3)
- {
- /* ??? Need to count the actual number of registers to be used,
- not the possible number of registers. Fix later. */
- return false;
- }
+ /* FIXME: The symbol indirect call doesn't need a
+ call-clobbered register. But we don't know if
+ this is a symbol indirect call or not here. */
+ if (ix86_function_regparm (type, NULL) >= 3
+ && !cfun->machine->arg_reg_available_p)
+ return false;
}
}
@@ -6567,6 +6567,7 @@ init_cumulative_args (CUMULATIVE_ARGS *cum, /* Argument info to initialize */
? X86_64_REGPARM_MAX
: X86_64_MS_REGPARM_MAX);
}
+ cfun->machine->arg_reg_available_p = cum->nregs != 0;
if (TARGET_SSE)
{
cum->sse_nregs = SSE_REGPARM_MAX;
@@ -6636,6 +6637,7 @@ init_cumulative_args (CUMULATIVE_ARGS *cum, /* Argument info to initialize */
else
cum->nregs = ix86_function_regparm (fntype, fndecl);
}
+ cfun->machine->arg_reg_available_p = cum->nregs != 0;
/* Set up the number of SSE registers used for passing SFmode
and DFmode arguments. Warn for mismatching ABI. */
@@ -7584,6 +7586,7 @@ pass_in_reg:
{
cum->nregs = 0;
cum->regno = 0;
+ cfun->machine->arg_reg_available_p = 0;
}
break;
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.h b/gcc/config/i386/i386.h
index 74334ff..0b6e304 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.h
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.h
@@ -2479,6 +2479,9 @@ struct GTY(()) machine_function {
/* If true, it is safe to not save/restore DRAP register. */
BOOL_BITFIELD no_drap_save_restore : 1;
+ /* If true, there is register available for argument passing. */
+ BOOL_BITFIELD arg_reg_available_p : 1;
+
/* During prologue/epilogue generation, the current frame state.
Otherwise, the frame state at the end of the prologue. */
struct machine_frame_state fs;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr66819-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr66819-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7c8a1ab
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr66819-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+/* { dg-do compile { target ia32 } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -mregparm=3" } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "call" } } */
+
+void foo(void (*bar)(void))
+{
+ bar();
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr66819-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr66819-2.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9de4f97
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr66819-2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+/* { dg-do compile { target ia32 } } */
+/* { dg-options "-fPIC -O2 -mregparm=3" } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "call" } } */
+
+void foo(void (*bar)(void))
+{
+ bar();
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr66819-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr66819-3.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3bc5a34
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr66819-3.c
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+/* { dg-do compile { target ia32 } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -mregparm=3" } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "call" } } */
+
+void (*bar)(int, int);
+
+void foo(int i, int j)
+{
+ bar(i, j);
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr66819-4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr66819-4.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..18b2ccf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr66819-4.c
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+/* { dg-do compile { target ia32 } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -mregparm=3" } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "call" } } */
+
+#include <stdarg.h>
+
+void (*bar)(int, va_list);
+
+void foo(int i, va_list args)
+{
+ bar(i, args);
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr66819-5.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr66819-5.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6b019d1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr66819-5.c
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+/* { dg-do compile { target ia32 } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -mregparm=3" } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "call" } } */
+
+void (*bar)(int, int, int);
+
+void foo(int i, int j, int k)
+{
+ bar(i, j, k);
+}
--
2.4.3
next reply other threads:[~2015-07-09 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-09 10:54 H.J. Lu [this message]
2015-07-09 11:04 ` Uros Bizjak
2015-07-09 11:12 ` H.J. Lu
2015-07-10 16:30 ` Uros Bizjak
2015-07-10 17:10 ` H.J. Lu
2015-07-10 17:21 ` Uros Bizjak
2015-07-10 17:58 ` H.J. Lu
2015-07-10 19:54 ` Uros Bizjak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150709105439.GA19247@gmail.com \
--to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).