Re: [RFC, Fortran, (pr66775)] Allocatable function result

[Andre Vehreschild <vehre@gmx.de>]

Hi,

> > module foo
> >    contains
> >    function bar(i)
> >       integer, allocatable :: bar
> >       integer, intent(in) :: i
> >       if (i > 0) bar = i
> >    end function bar
> > end module foo
> > 
> > program test
> >    use foo
> >    integer j
> >    j = bar( 3); print *, j
> >    j = bar(-3); print *, j
> >    end if
> > end program test
> > 
> > Even if Andre developed a patch to allocate memory in
> > bar() for the i <= 0 case to prevent the segfault, the
> > function must return a value.  What should that value be?
> Your example is, of course, 100% invalid; a value is needed to put in j.
> But the case is more debatable to me, if j is allocatable.
> In that case an unallocated bar() result could just make j unallocated.

Yes, completely right. The example so far is not on the point I try to make.
For your example Steve, the result of bar has to be allocated, no argument on
that, but what about, when j is allocatable? As stated in a previous mail,
that property is not called allocated, but allocatable...

- Andre
-- 
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de