From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: richard.guenther@gmail.com (Richard Biener)
Cc: mliska@suse.cz, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Still crashes due to aliasing violation (Re: [RFC, PATCH] Split pool_allocator and create a new object_allocator)
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 13:50:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150717134424.08493B042@oc7340732750.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F3DEE900-7F8E-4D98-9CAA-254C54CDEC7E@gmail.com> from "Richard Biener" at Jul 17, 2015 03:25:07 PM
Richard Biener wrote:
> On July 17, 2015 3:11:51 PM GMT+02:00, Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> >(Since there is no C++ operator new involved at all anymore,
> >this clearly violates even the C aliasing rules ...)
> >
> >I really think the allocate routine needs to be more careful to
> >avoid violating aliasing, e.g. by using memcpy or union-based
> >type-punning to access its free list info.
>
> As far as I understand the object allocator delegates construction to callers and thus in the above case cselib
> Would be responsible for calling placement new on the return value from
> Allocate.
Ah, it looks like I was wrong above: the code uses the *object*
allocator, so it should go through a placement new here:
inline T *
allocate () ATTRIBUTE_MALLOC
{
return ::new (m_allocator.allocate ()) T ();
}
It's still being miscompiled at least by my GCC 4.1 host compiler ...
Bye,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain
Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-17 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-29 14:01 [RFC, PATCH] Split pool_allocator and create a new object_allocator Martin Liška
2015-07-02 20:09 ` Richard Sandiford
2015-07-02 21:08 ` Trevor Saunders
2015-07-03 8:56 ` Richard Sandiford
2015-07-03 10:11 ` Martin Liška
2015-07-03 12:22 ` Martin Jambor
2015-07-03 13:07 ` Richard Sandiford
2015-07-03 14:15 ` Martin Liška
2015-07-03 16:19 ` Richard Sandiford
2015-07-09 21:43 ` Martin Liška
2015-07-10 14:19 ` Pat Haugen
2015-07-16 11:00 ` Martin Liška
2015-07-16 11:03 ` Richard Biener
2015-07-17 13:25 ` Still crashes due to aliasing violation (Re: [RFC, PATCH] Split pool_allocator and create a new object_allocator) Ulrich Weigand
2015-07-17 13:44 ` Richard Biener
2015-07-17 13:50 ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2015-07-17 13:54 ` Martin Liška
2015-07-17 15:37 ` Richard Biener
2015-07-17 17:49 ` Ulrich Weigand
2015-07-17 18:12 ` Richard Biener
2015-07-17 21:57 ` Ulrich Weigand
2015-07-18 13:04 ` Richard Biener
2015-07-17 18:14 ` Martin Liška
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150717134424.08493B042@oc7340732750.ibm.com \
--to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=mliska@suse.cz \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).